You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Intelligence chiefs are not anxious to give up their access to your information.
The administration is considering four potential options for its massive, bulk collection of U.S. citizens cellphone data, the Wall Street Journalreports. One option would be to discontinue dragnet data collection, and the other three are variations of running it through the telephone companies, and having them store the data.
None of the three options for relocating the data have gained universal favor. But failure to agree on one of them would leave only the option of abolishing the program, which would be a setback for intelligence agencies and other backers of the surveillance effort. Of the three options for relocating the data, two of them—with phone companies or another government agency—appear most technically possible. [...]
Obama administration officials have sought to preserve the collection of phone records in a way that raises fewer concerns about privacy.
One way of doing that would have the phone companies retain the data, officials said. The NSA would then tell the companies when it needs searches of call records concerning specific phone numbers the agency believes are connected to terrorism. The companies would provide the results to the NSA.
Under this model, the NSA would only collect the data that comes in response to the search, rather than millions of unrelated American phone records.
The companies are not keen on this idea, worried about the liability, and the inevitable outside demands for the data from all levels of law enforcement to lawyers in divorce cases. They would require extensive protections in any legislation. House Intelligence Chair Mike Rogers (R-MI) says he doesn't have support in committee to pass this option. Other possibilities are other federal agencies like the FBI holding the data (because that would lessen civil liberty concerns?) or even the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court holding it.
Apparently the option of reforming our intelligence agencies to actually work effectively without turning every American into a potential terrorism suspect is not a viable one as far as the administration and its advisors are concerned.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Wed Feb 26, 2014 at 02:21 PM PST.