This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

How would you feel if you'd finally finished a project you'd envisioned years, decades before and it turned out better than you'd dreamed. . .

. . . and you couldn't do a thing with it?

A Saturday night story and video for you all.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

A quarter-century ago, a smartass studio engineer/producer had an idea that was so awesome he knew it could never work.

The idea involved combining the lyrics of one song with the melody of another in a process akin to today's mashups. The funny bit was how very different the songs were in meaning, while the rhythm of the lyric fit seamlessly with the other composition. Brilliant, really, and so drop dead obvious that the engineer/producer only told one person, his friend the studio intern, of the idea. For years.

He worked on various versions over the years, making and tossing, then recently decided to just do the bloody thing. Came up with a pretty killer cut, too.

And here his troubles began. Because there's not a thing he can do with it.

Few years back, he ran into the writer of one of the songs at an event and, on impulse, told him of the concept. At first the composer, a legendary writer and producer, just looked at him with the vague but polite "whatever" stare he'd often wear when dealing with the adoring public, but as the idea got through, a sly smile spread across his face. "Oh, that's good" was his reply.

The other piece's author and the engineer/producer don't really run in the same circles, so our hero's never gotten his take on it, though Writer Two seems the sort with a wry sense of humor. Probably have a similar response.

But in covering songs, particularly in making derivative works, the songwriters aren't necessarily the problem. The publishers are.

Publishers control how a song is used and, as they make up to 50% of the dough generated, they're quite protective of copyrights. If this had been a straight up cover of either song, the process would be simple: send a letter to the publisher or to the Harry Fox Agency requesting a compulsory mechanical license, pay the standard rate to the publisher and cut the damn song.

But this wasn't a straight cover, by any stretch. As a remix or mashup, it constitutes a "derivative work," which requires special permission from the publisher.

And while both authors might approve heartily of this adaptation of their work (particularly as the engineer/producer makes no claim of authorship and would be pleased as punch to make them even more filthy rich with the mechanicals), the publishing companies may not feel so sanguine.

This is especially true in the case of the second piece, itself one of the highest-earning compositions in history, the publishers of which are notoriously zealous in controlling the use of the writer's work.

(Readers will note the names of the songwriters and compositions do not appear in the diary, and I would request that commenters refrain from mentioning them as well. The longer this piece does not attract the notice of certain guys in suits, the more chance it has of actually being heard).

What's worse (for our hapless engineer/producer) is that, without such permission, he can't hope to make anything off this recording. To sell downloads would be infringement, to put up a video could easily get his YouTube channel shut down.

Thankfully, Jon Stewart found the Mitch McConnell b-roll footage and started the phenomenon known as McConnelling. This gave our hero the opportunity to release the song under a name not his own, on a YouTube channel unrelated to his.

Now the piece has been set free to run in the wild zones beyond copyrights and publishing administration. Hopefully, someday, there will come a time when it, and its creator, can stand tall in the recognition and (minimal) remuneration due them.

Until that day, feel free to enjoy, and share, "YesterNights."

For those with embed problems, here's a direct link to the video.

A few production notes: There are no royalty-bearing samples on the recording. All parts were performed by the cut's creator, except the acoustic drum loops (freeware from Beta Monkey) and the background vocal in the second bridge, which is the speech synthesizer program from the old Atari 1040 ST.

If, upon listening, you feel you've wasted two minutes you'll never get back, I feel ya. It was 25 years for some.

Finally. if you should happen to run in very different circles from our hero and actually know Author Two, pass this along. I think he'd get a kick out of it.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.