This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

From Harper's Index Apr 2014:

Portion of US jobs held by humans today that are at high risk of being automated by 2024: ½
Harper’s cites The Oxford Martin School at Oxford University.  Harold Myerson seems to be referring to the same study in a Washington Post op-ed called “The Coming Job Apocalypse.”  

When computers first emerged in the public’s consciousness in the 1950s and 1960s, it was something of a running joke that these machines would eventually put humans out of business. I remember an Allan Sherman parody from the early sixties called “Automation”, sung to the tune of “Fascination.”  The song’s storyline concerns a businessman who loses his beloved secretary to a “ten ton machine” which then proceeds to straddle over and sit on the boss’s lap (“When she said ‘I love you’ and gave me a hug/ That’s when I pulled out…the plug!”).  

It was a joke then, but I’m not laughing now.  Almost every day I notice or hear about some previous source of gainful employment that is no longer necessary because of computerization or the internet.  NPR recently carried a rather mournful item about a movie projectionist’s last day at work.  His multiplex was converting to all-digital projection, and only a button-pusher would be needed in the future.

For decades, the response has always been that new fields and opportunities would open up to replace those that are lost.  And this may have happened to some extent through the late 20th century.  But it seems we are reaching the critical mass where so much employment will be squeezed out that we can’t possibly hope sustain the full employment levels we are used to.  

A segment of people who are either exceptionally talented or have other advantages will continue to do well, maybe very well.   But what about all the average Joes and Janes?  Up till now, most of them could find careers that might not have been the most fulfilling, but at least provided a comfortable middle-class existence.  That is becoming increasingly difficult.  What are all the people replaced by voice-mail systems and internet apps going to do with their lives?  

We are constantly bombarded with boosterism about our high-tech future.  Only a handful of critics like Jaron Lanier have tried to take a serious look at the dark side, in particular the extent to which the internet sucks middle-class employment out of the economy.  One of Lanier’s examples is that the now-defunct Kodak employed around 140,000 people in well-paying middle class jobs.  By contrast, Instagram has 13 employees.    

What the solution is I’m not sure.  Digital socialism, in the form of some kind of guaranteed income for all?  If not, we may have half the population living in squalor, not a pleasant prospect for any of us.  And even if we go the guaranteed income route, what effect will it have on society if a large percentage of young people have little or no chance at fulfilling careers?  

It won’t affect me personally (I’m too old), but I worry about the future my kids and their contemporaries will be living in.  Jaron Lanier is optimistic that we will find a solution.  I hope he’s right.  In any case, it’s something we should be facing up to and planning for.  


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.