This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) (R), speaks with Representative Elijah Cummings (D-MD) at Capitol Hill in Washington June 20, 2012. The House Oversight and Government Operations Committee is conside
Politico's latest piece of IQ-sapping analysis and reporting begins like this:
It was supposed to be an easy win: The most loathed federal agency engaged in what amounted to discrimination against tea party-backed nonprofits.

But 10 months out from the first IRS scandal headline, some Republicans are unhappy with their party’s investigation — and they point a finger at the man who helped sustain the national uproar: Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)

First things first: The notion that the IRS exclusively targeted tea party groups has been debunked time and again. Far from a political witch hunt, the IRS was merely doing what Congress requires it do: Review applications from political groups seeking taxpayer subsidies in the form of non-profit status. The fact that there were a lot of tea party groups seeking such status in 2010 does not a scandal make.

Second, while it's true that the IRS is one of the least popular government agencies, it's not necessarily the most unpopular. According to Pew, that honor goes to the Department of Education. Plus, as Pew notes, the IRS is still vastly more popular than Congress. And I'll add one more note: The IRS is also far more popular than the Republican Party—or the tea party.

Please read below the fold for more on this story.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

But as lame as the article's opening is, its intellectual punch doesn't really hit bottom until Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz offers up the following quote:

“There is a perception that if your case is rock-solid, it doesn’t need months to sort it out,” said Chaffetz, who like several others, said the recent dust-up between Issa and top panel Democrat Elijah Cummings was unfortunate.
Out of context, that might actually seem like a good point to make, given that the number one reason the IRS "scandal" has failed to make a dent is that the case itself is not rock-solid. But that's not the point Chaffetz was making. He was trying to assert—without evidence—that the case was in fact rock solid, but that Issa's handling of it made it seem like it wasn't rock solid.

In other words, instead of blaming the fizzle of the "scandal" on the fact that there actually isn't an underlying scandal, Chaffetz is blaming Issa for dragging his feet in exposing the true scandal. Of course, Issa is hardly alone in failing to expose this true scandal. Chaffetz has failed as well, along with every other Republican who has tried.

In a non-hermetically-sealed environment, they might reach the conclusion that the fact they haven't uncovered a scandal means there isn't one, but for these guys, the investigation begins with the assumption that the scandal must exist. It doesn't take much logic to realize what this means: For as long as Republicans run the Oversight Committee and Barack Obama is president, the investigation will continue, because it cannot end until it uncovers that which does not exist.

The one thing that I think everybody can agree on, however, is that it's all Darrell Issa's fault. At least mostly.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.