This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

We know that money talks, but that is the problem, not the answer.  — Anthony Lewis, NYT, Feb. 5, 1976

Bribery, as defined by Black's Law Dictionary, is "The receiving or offering of any undue reward by or to any person whomsoever, whose ordinary profession or business related to the administration of public justice, in order to influence his behavior in office, and to incline him to act contrary to his duty and the known rules of honesty and integrity."

The"Fossil fuel industry lobbying expenditure and contributions to the U.S. Congress amounted to over $536 million in the 112th Congress (2011-12)." Oil Change International, explained, "North American oil and natural gas companies reported a combined $271 billion in profits last year. It said a "huge share" of the overall profits can't be accounted for, however, because private companies", Such as Koch Industries who Spent Twice as Much on the 2012 Election as the Top Ten Unions Combined, "aren't required to disclose their financial information."

In other words, an industry that doesn't even disclose their financial information, has been pushing for unlimited control of our political process that it plans to fund through an unlimited amount of dirty oil that it plans to transport through our waterways, with protection of politicians for the benefit of a elite few, and their stockholders, while putting our most fragile resource, drinking water, at risk.

This is why we cannot have renewable energy.  Because Oil and Gas companies ensure that through manipulation of the government, that they can maintain their monopolies,  manipulate the cost of energy, buy politicians and destroy Unions.

Why can't you spend your money in politics how ever you like?

 “‘I just want to donate to more candidates,’ said McCutcheon, adding rhetorically: ‘Why am I not free to spend money however I want?’” Since the Supreme Court seems to not have an answer, let's look at SCOTUS precedent. One of the things that you should read is Buckley V. Valeo as it has already handled the subject that Roberts has mangled.

The prevention of corruption is essential not only to make government work for its intended purpose, e.g., ensure that public officials are using their office to further the public interest and not to enrich themselves or others, but also to preserve public confidence in the democratic process. As to the latter, the United States Supreme Court has observed: “[A] democracy is effective only if the people have faith in those who govern, and that faith is bound to be shattered when high officials and their appointees engage in activities which arouse suspicions of malfeasance and corruption.” (United States v. Miss. Valley Generating Co.)

In view of the fundamental nature of the right to associate, governmental "action which may have the effect of curtailing the freedom to associate is subject to the closest scrutiny." NAACP v. Alabama, supra, at 460-461. Yet, it is clear that "[n]either the right to associate nor the right to participate in political activities is absolute." CSC v. Letter Carriers, 413 U. S. 548, 567 (1973). Even a "'significant interference' with protected rights of political association" may be sustained if the State demonstrates a sufficiently important interest and employs means closely drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgment of associational freedoms. Cousins v. Wigoda, supra, at 488; NAACP v. Button, supra, at 438; Shelton v. Tucker, supra, at 488. Buckley V. Valeo

"In the 2006 election cycle, oil and gas companies contributed over $19 million to political campaigns. 82% of that money went to Republican candidates" (Wikipedia) of the oil lobbyists who brought this money to their republican allies, 75% of these lobbyists worked prior in regulation of the same industries. The result of the revolving door can be seen with the presence of carcinogens in the drinking water of millions of Americans, while "estimates of annual fossil fuel subsidies range from $14 billion to $52 billion annually."
"Most bribes are paid by large multinational corporations from developed countries.  In fact the tax laws of most industrialized countries including France, Canada, Germany and Australia, until recently allowed for a tax deduction for bribes paid overseas.  Therefore a company could be prosecuted for engaging in bribery in its home country but is given a tax break for engaging in the same conduct in foreign countries." Elizabeth Sietsema Republicans see Ms. Sietsma's point, but have decided that instead of trying to extend the rule of law, they wish to destroy it.  

Instead, Republicans are perfectly fine with Sheldon Addleson and George Sorros deciding our leaders for us. I don't think this is how democracy should work.  This is surely not how our constitution is framed. "The ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, offers an oligarchic and anti-democratic reinterpretation of the First Amendment. Roberts argues, under the guise of defending “freedom of speech,” that the First Amendment protects the right of tiny layer of the population to unfettered control over the political system." WSW Allowing, millionaires donations to be substitutes for debate, dialogue, the democratic process and the electoral college.

Not only did Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the outcome of the case, but has also written to say that he would have gone further and wiped away all contribution limits. Because that is what we need. One person being able to actually outright purchase a politician.  Looks like that is coming soon.
Cheif Justice Roberts writes that “we have made clear that Congress may not regulate contributions simply to reduce the amount of money in politics, or to restrict the political participation of some in order to enhance the relative influence of others.” He adds, “Money in politics may at times seem repugnant to some, but so too does much of what the First Amendment vigorously protects.
According to Global Research, "Roberts argues that, in effect, under the guise of defending “freedom of speech,” the First Amendment protects the right of tiny layer of the population to unfettered control over the political system." How? Nearly 60 percent of Super PAC funding came from just 159 donors contributing at least $1 million. More than 93 percent of the money Super PACs raised came in contributions of at least $10,000—from just 3,318 donors, or the equivalent of 0.0011 percent of the US population.

 “If the First Amendment protects flag burning, funeral protests and Nazi parades – despite the profound offense such spectacles cause – it surely protects political campaign speech despite popular opinion.” This assassin opinion was given by our Supreme Court.

"In the (words) of the dissenting opinion in McCutcheon, delivered by Justice Breyer, along with Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, “Taken together with Citizens United…, today’s decision eviscerates our Nation’s campaign finance laws, leaving a remnant incapable of dealing with the grave problems of democratic legitimacy that those laws were intended to resolve.”


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.