This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Ezra Klein launched his new Vox venture on Monday with a piece titled, “How Politics Makes Us Stupid.” Looking at some recent research suggesting that “individuals subconsciously resist factual information that threatens their defining values,” Klein concluded, “People weren’t reasoning to get the right answer; they were reasoning to get the answer that they wanted to be right.”

On Friday, Politico offered a case in point with an article titled, “Obama now outpacing George W. Bush on judges.”  Motivated perhaps by a desire to show that Republican obstruction of President Obama’s judicial nominees wasn’t unusual and therefore Senate Democrats’ decision to deploy the “nuclear option” wasn't necessary, the National Review (“Obama outpaces Bush on judicial nominations”), the Wall Street Journal (“Obama picks up pace on judicial picks, tally surpasses George W. Bush’s”) and even the Washington Post quickly (“Obama overtakes George W. Bush on judges confirmed”) quickly followed suit.

But if you went around parroting those headlines, you’d look pretty stupid, indeed. As the same data show, President Bush’s choices for the federal bench were confirmed at a rate 9 percentage points higher (88 to 79 percent) than Barack Obama’s:

Over the course of his presidency so far, Obama has nominated 301 judges and gotten 237 confirmed. By this point in his presidency, Bush had nominated 267 judges and had 234 of them confirmed.

As of April 4, Obama has gotten 44 circuit court judges and 191 district court judges confirmed. As of April 4, 2006, Bush had 43 circuit court and 189 district court judges confirmed.

Please read below the fold for more on this story.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

An alarming number of judicial vacancies had plagued the Obama administration throughout his first term. Part of that was Obama’s own fault. As Dylan Matthews documented in July 2013, President Obama lagged in selecting new appointees to the federal bench. But even with that caveat, Obama’s picks faced unprecedented GOP obstruction that derailed their nominations at record rates. After one year in office, Obama saw only 43 percent of his judicial selections confirmed, compared to 79 percent for George W. Bush. After two years, Obama’s figure improved to 58 percent, still far behind Presidents George W. Bush, Clinton, George H.W. Bush, Reagan and Carter who had 77 percent, 90 percent, 96 percent, 98 percent, and 97 percent confirmed respectively. By the end of 2012, Obama’s appeal court picks actually enjoyed a higher confirmation rate (71 to 67 percent) than Bush’s. But among district court nominees, Obama still trailed.

So, the real story about staffing the federal judiciary is this: Thanks in part to a massive effort by his chief of staff Denis McDonough and counsel Kathy Ruemmler to reprioritize judicial nominations for his second term, Barack Obama has begun to make headway in filling judicial vacancies Chief Justice John Roberts called a “crisis.” But the biggest factor was breaking through the Republican logjam, an advance made possible only by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s decision to “go nuclear” and end the judicial filibuster for all seats but the Supreme Court. Even still, GOP’s “blue-slip” holds are helping to keep 31 Obama nominees from getting an “up or down vote.”

There are many reasons why politics is making us stupid. But you don’t have to buy Ezra Klein’s argument to see that Politico isn’t helping.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Jon Perr on Tue Apr 08, 2014 at 01:16 PM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.