You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Ben Hallman wrote on Huffington Post that some of the states that have embraced the extreme right-wing agenda against domestic government spending are those which get the most from federal spending. Contradicting the stupid and hateful rhetoric of South Carolina’s plethora of faux right-wing populist politicians, federal tax payers in that state get back almost $8.00 for every $1.00 they spend in federal taxes.
You remember borrowing a thought from the anti-democratic Ayn Rand, Mitt Romney was secretly taped saying that 47 percent of Americans are “Takers,” i.e. folks that don’t contribute and take from the government.
We all know that the real takers are the biggest employers in America, those who subsidize their employees with federal benefits and teach their employees how to access those federal subsidies.
The most well known of these employers is, of course, Walmart whose employees are the single most identifiable group that relies on Medicaid for healthcare. You may remember that Walmart, in contradiction to its own seeming self-interest, warned their employees to vote Republican in 2010.
South Carolina, with the greatest taking of any state, is the most contradictory and hypocritical of all. South Carolina’s Governor Nikki Haley recently said they didn’t want and would reject any union employers and/or jobs in her state. Never mind that union jobs pay well over the poverty line, and have health insurance that takes a huge load off Medicaid.
These politicians that rail against benefits for the poor–working poor–must either be the biggest hypocrites in human history or simply hate their own constituents. Former South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint is one of the worst. He has made a career hating on the working poor and unions, which are the quickest and cheapest way out of poverty. First, he built and refined his hate into a seat in the US Senate. Now he heads the Heritage Foundation, surely one of America’s most extremist foundations and bastions of hate for the working poor and unions.
And these folks thump their Bibles as if there is no admonition against oppression in those Bibles and no requirement to provide for the poor.