This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

cross-posted at MN Progressive Project

Yes, Obamacare trutherism is a thing. Conservatives don't believe it can possibly work, so all the good news is lie. There's the national version, that the numbers are made up, and in Minnesota we have our own version, that MNSure was bailed out by the state.

Probably many reasonable people are also incredulous at the idea Obamacare worked, because the pundit class and the beltway media joined the conservative bubble in trumpeting everything that went wrong, except the Medicaid gap; they were happy to ignore that. Reasonable people, however, will eventually figure out there wasn't a disaster (hopefully before election day). Conservatives are off in full-throated denial after their media and politicians spent years telling them Obamacare is a disaster, already failed, lost in a death spiral, blah de blah --- and now turns out Obamacare failed to fail. Even Healthcare.gov works now. Bad enough the predictions of failure were wrong, but conservative media often announced it had failed, and how can anybody be so stupid as to not see that? So the numbers must be all fake!

Yeah, um, about that. Let's see if I can help any conservatives browsing by (let's play concern troll!), and who buy the notion that Obama's numbers are so fake you'd think he was trying to sell an invasion of Iraq. How can you tell if the numbers are real? Regarding the Census Bureau changing some questions, you could send a journalist to actually ask them for details. Granted, that would require having some journalists, so that's a tough one for conservatives. Still, then you could find out they've been working on these revisions since before Obamacare and testing for a few years, so comparisons will be apples to apples. Nothing hidden there.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Also, there are outside sources of information, so no having to take Dick Cheney's word for it that Saddam and Osama are best buddies and no, you can't see any intelligence but the few bits we cherrypicked for you. Gallup is doing its own surveys, insurers collect their own information, and no doubt public health researchers will be conducting their surveys. No need to simply trust the government's claims.

And of course, like is often the case with conspiracy theories, for this to be a conspiracy, loads of people need to be in on the plot, and able to keep quiet about it. None of that huge number can blow the whistle, be overheard by the wrong person,  leave memos or data laying around. Ever. If you believe that can be the case, you're pretty much the definition of someone who would believe anything (provided it was unprovable).

"Trutherism" might be a bit strong on MNSure. I suppose that's really just a talking point that's dishonest or grossly uninformed, your mileage might vary. Specifically of course I'm referring to the "bailout" claim, that the state bailed out MNSure. The linked MPR article explained what happened with MNSure's shortfall that supposedly required a bailout. Briefly, premiums were lower than expected (generally a good thing, unless you're a Republican candidate determined to complain about anything), which resulted in lower federal matching funds, so MNSure's funding ran short. The shortfall was made up by transferring some costs from the MNSure fund to the general treasury. If you believe that's a bailout, then you must think you can bailout yourself, which most of us actually refer to as "the opposite of a bailout". This is like paying for your purchase by digging into your pocket and coming up short, so you get a "bailout" in the form of digging into your other pocket for the rest of the money. "Hey look, my pants pocket received a bailout --- from my jacket pocket!  Oh no, I'm about to become a MNGOP talking point!"

I'm glad I could lay conservatives' concerns to rest. So of course Obamacare haters are going to look at the numbers, look at where they come from, apply some logic, fact-check talking points, be glad that millions of uninsured people now have the security of insurance, and accept the now obvious point that uninsured people badly want the security of insurance no matter how much trouble it is to get it, making Obamacare bound to attract millions.

Stop laughing!

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to ericf on Fri Apr 18, 2014 at 11:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.