This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

lethal injection, death penalty
A groundbreaking study in the latest issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences concludes from statistical analysis that if all inmates sentenced to death remained on death row indefinitely, 4.1 percent would eventually be exonerated. Only 1.6 percent have actually been exonerated. Since a large number don't remain there indefinitely on account of being executed, it can be extrapolated that more people whose lives are taken by the state, or originally scheduled to be taken, are innocent of the crime for which they were convicted. Since 1976, 1,378 inmates have been executed in the United States.

If the study's conclusion is accurate, it means the number of people who have been exonerated of the crimes for which they were sentenced to be executed would be nearly double the number who actually have been. And the authors make clear that their estimate is conservative. Since 1989, 138 death row inmates have been exonerated after proving they were innocent. The authors estimate that 340 would be exonerated under the conditions they set forth.

Here's the abstract of "Rate of false conviction of criminal defendants who are sentenced to death" by Samuel R. Gross, Barbara O’Brien, Chen Huc and Edward H. Kennedy:

The rate of erroneous conviction of innocent criminal defendants is often described as not merely unknown but unknowable. There is no systematic method to determine the accuracy of a criminal conviction; if there were, these errors would not occur in the first place. As a result, very few false convictions are ever discovered, and those that are discovered are not representative of the group as a whole. In the United States, however, a high proportion of false convictions that do come to light and produce exonerations are concentrated among the tiny minority of cases in which defendants are sentenced to death. This makes it possible to use data on death row exonerations to estimate the overall rate of false conviction among death sentences. The high rate of exoneration among death-sentenced defendants appears to be driven by the threat of execution, but most death-sentenced defendants are removed from death row and resentenced to life imprisonment, after which the likelihood of exoneration drops sharply. We use survival analysis to model this effect, and estimate that if all death-sentenced defendants remained under sentence of death indefinitely, at least 4.1% would be exonerated. We conclude that this is a conservative estimate of the proportion of false conviction among death sentences in the United States.
In taking note of the study, The Innocence Project points out that "many other innocent capital defendants are missed if they are removed from death row or have their sentences reduced to life in prison after appeals. Once the threat of wrongful execution is removed, less time and resources are devoted to seeking out cases of possible innocence."

Please read below the fold for more on this subject.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The authors found that some 2,675 people were taken off death row between 1973 and 2004 and resentenced because of doubts about their convictions. Many have since died and most of the rest will die in prison without our ever learning whether they committed the crimes they were once sentenced to die for. It is forever impossible to know how many people were falsely convicted. But lead author Samuel Gross says:

“If you look at the numbers in our study, at how many errors are made, then you cannot believe that we haven’t executed any innocent person – that would be wishful thinking.” [...]

The ballpark figure of at least 4.1% innocence is higher than previous studies looking at exoneration rates that had smaller sample sizes and were more restricted in their remit. It is also considerably higher than the estimate given in 2007 by the conservative US supreme court justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote that American criminal convictions generally had an “error rate of .027% – or, to put it another way, a success rate of 99.973%”.

The authors comment tartly with respect to Scalia’s skills as a statistician: “That would be comforting, if true. In fact, the claim is silly.”

One of the more charitable descriptions of Scalia's remarks.
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Tue Apr 29, 2014 at 11:21 AM PDT.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.