This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

One of the first things North Carolina Republicans did after taking full control of state government was to pass a law that would have effectively ended tenure for the state's public school teachers.  But yesterday, a judge threw it out after finding it violated both the federal and state constitutions.

Superior Court Judge Robert Hobgood ordered a permanent injunction against the implementation of the law that ends career status, known as teacher tenure. The judge’s decision applies statewide to teachers who already have tenure, but not to those who haven’t yet earned it.

Retroactively abolishing tenure for teachers, Hobgood said, violates the contract clause in the U.S. Constitution and “amounts to an unconstitutional taking of plaintiffs’ property rights in their existing contract,” which violates the state constitution.

Hobgood said the legislature’s action harmed teachers’ contracts and “was not reasonable and necessary to serve an important public purpose.”
The law, passed last year, had directed school districts to offer the top 25 percent of teachers four-year contracts and $500 to relinquish their tenure status. The judge’s order halts the implementation of that provision, which he said had “no discernible, workable standards” to guide local boards and superintendents.

Since 1971, all North Carolina teachers have been initially hired on a probationary basis.  After four years, they gain tenure--which among other things gives teachers the right to a hearing before being fired.  The GOP claimed that ending tenure was necessary to make it easier to get rid of bad teachers, citing a 2012-13 study that showed only 17 teachers statewide had been fired.  What they didn't tell us, though, was that the very same study found 87 teachers had resigned rather than face certain termination, and another 294 had resigned for unknown reasons.  

Needless to say, NCAE president Rodney Ellis was overjoyed by this ruling.  He explained that when the General Assembly passed this law, it forgot that tenure allows teachers to focus on teaching.

“It’s a means for protecting teachers from unfair dismissals,” Ellis said of career status. “It’s a means by which we can avoid school politics impacting employment in our schools for teachers ... It does not guarantee you a right to a job for life. But instead, it just awards you an opportunity to actually go through a process, a fair hearing process, before you’re dismissed.”
NAE president Dennis Van Roekel pointed out that North Carolina has a hard enough time attracting teachers willing to work for the fourth-lowest salary in the nation, and this law would have made it even more difficult to attract quality teachers.

A week earlier, another judge issued a preliminary injunction exempting schools in Greensboro and Durham from the law.  However, in siding with six teachers and the North Carolina Association of Educators who sued to throw out the law, Hobgood ensured that all the state's teachers will keep the rights they have once they gain tenure.

State senate pro tem Phil Berger issued an apoplectic statement claiming that Hobgood had engaged in "a classic case of judicial activism," and hinted that he wants the ruling appealed.  No word on whether attorney general Roy Cooper will oblige.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Christian Dem in NC on Sat May 17, 2014 at 03:14 PM PDT.

Also republished by Teachers Lounge.

Your Email has been sent.