You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is in the middle of telling a big lie that—if accepted—could neutralize one of the most potent arguments against reelecting him: That his support for repealing Obamacare wouldn't take away health insurance from the 421,000 Kentuckians who have received coverage through Kynect, the health insurance marketplace established by the state thanks to Obamacare.
Naturally, Mitch's claim has journalists scratching their heads and has even has a spokesman for his Democratic challenger saying the senator "cannot tell the difference between fact and fiction." In today's Washington Post, fact checker Glenn Kessler tries to get at the bottom of what Mitch meant, resulting in a convoluted flurry of claims from McConnell's campaign manager about what exactly his boss was trying to convey when he said that Kynect's fate was "unconnected" with Obamacare. A flavor of McConnell-land's response:
Benton responded: “Medicaid existed before Obamacare and will exist if we are able to repeal it. Obamacare loosened eligibility requirements for Medicaid recipients, and in the process, helped find many who were already eligible but no enrolled. These people would remain eligible even after a repeal. The federal government does allow states flexibility in setting requirements and Kentucky could be able to keep many of the newly enrolled in the program if we decided to.”
Kessler concludes that McConnell is trying to "straddle a political fence" and his colleague Greg Sargent concludes that McConnell's position is "still gibberish," but at a minimum, Mitch "wants Kentucky residents to think he would, or that he might" keep popular elements of Obamacare intact.
My view is that turning this into a debate over nitty-gritty policy details is a mistake: Mitch McConnell's position is that we can repeal Obamacare and keep everything good about it too. That's not a policy statement, it's a political one, and trying to evaluate it as a serious statement of policy gives it more respect than it deserves.
McConnell should have the opportunity to withdraw his claim that repealing the Affordable Care Act is unconnected to Kynect's fate. If he wants to go back to defending Obamacare repeal, by all means, let him. But trying to understand what he meant and giving him a chance to explain it makes as much sense as suggesting that there's a nuanced discussion to be had over the question of whether 1+1=3.
Originally posted to Daily Kos on Thu May 29, 2014 at 09:15 AM PDT.