You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
I'd say this is a new low for climate change denialism, but there may be no such thing:
[CNBC host] Andrew Ross Sorkin challenged [climate change denier William Happer] for "not believ[ing] in climate change" -- to which Happer responded by telling Sorkin to "shut up." Sorkin then asked Happer about comments he made to The Daily Princetonian in 2009 comparing climate science to Nazi propaganda. Happer doubled down on his comments, stating that "the demonization of carbon dioxide is just like the demonization of the poor Jews under Hitler. Carbon dioxide is actually a benefit to the world, and so were the Jews."
Happer is a semi-prominent and professional "expert" denier who has testified to Congress about how excess carbon dioxide will be just peachy; he currently chairs the George C. Marshall Institute, a famously always-wrong conservative think-tank whose exploits include denying harmful effects of smoking, denying the impact of CFCs on the ozone layer, and telling us in the 1980s that the Soviet Union would crush us all if we did not invest heavily in the "Star Wars" program. They have close ties to the American Petroleum Institute and ExxonMobil.
So why did CNBC book this crank? Possibly because CNBC, as a business network, gives no more sh-ts about facts than any of the others so long as the customer, by which I do not mean you, dear investor, is happy. Or it might be part of this reflexive insistence that every business-unfriendly fact must be "balanced," even if the only "balance" available is from people who think carbon dioxide is like the Jews in Nazi Germany. The next question is whether CNBC will ever book this crank again, now that his crackpottery has reached Godwinian levels. Let's (not) watch.
Originally posted to Hunter on Tue Jul 15, 2014 at 09:48 AM PDT.