This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

The latest debates and debacles reveal a schizophrenic attitude toward the death penalty in general. On the one hand, the majority is for the death penalty, falsely convincing itself that it works as a deterrent and that the condemned "deserve" it. That works out psychologically to implementing the death penalty as revenge. But we as a society are not willing to state it so bluntly.

On the other hand, we are squeamish about the brutality and so have moved to the lethal injection fantasy as if it were as painless as putting down a pet. But the medical community is unwilling to play along with that self delusion.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The United States is the only society that has moved massively to lethal injection as a means of carrying out capital punishment. That is the result of severe ambivalence toward it. For all the chest-thumping calls for (Texas-like) quick and frequent application of the death penalty, which should not shy from forms like hanging or the recent judicially recommended firing squad, almost all states that have the death penalty now prescribe lethal injection.

This is primarily to try to give the act of killing someone an air of sanitary serenity, like putting a beloved puppy "to sleep." It is, however, really psychologically in opposition to the above mentioned bravado which calls for death even though actual data that it is not a deterrent and that other societies have less violent crime without it are simply ignored in the lust for revenge. Even Texas uses injection and now we are discovering that this supposedly merciful method is resulting in equally gruesome results.

Another sign of society's reluctance is the number of actual executions that take place as opposed to death sentences given. No more is this more apparent that California, whose death penalty was recently declared unconstitutional due to the infrequency and randomness of actual executions, which take place an average of 25 years after sentencing if at all. Such cumbersome bureaucracy is a symptom of our ambivalence as a society--admit it or not--that we are uncomfortable with the death penalty to the point of self-deception.

This will not be solved by resorting back to some more "direct and honest" method, but rather by our facing as a country our true feeling about inflicting this punishment on anyone, no matter how "deserved" it may appear.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.