You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.
Posting a Diary Entry
Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as
is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.
When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.
If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.
ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.
One diary daily maximum.
Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries
that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
President Obama's judicial nominations are finally being approved, thanks to the filibuster reform Senate Democrats approved last year, allowing for simple majority votes to advance judicial and executive nominations. In fact, confirmation of Obama's judicial nominees is outpacing the rate for the two previous presidents.
Before the Senate left town for recess last week, it confirmed the president's 52nd circuit nominee, Pamela Harris, to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, by a vote of 50-43.
At the end of his sixth year, George W. Bush confirmed 51 circuit judges; Bill Clinton confirmed 50 circuit judges.
The Senate has been historically unproductive in the 113th Congress but Democrats have worked to speedily confirm Obama nominees before the November elections, when Republicans have a serious chance at regaining control.
Outpacing his predecessors this year doesn't catch Obama up with nominations, though, largely because vacancies have been increasing in the last two years, whereas they declined for both Clinton and Bush in the fifth and sixth years of their terms. The White House, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, have made getting judges through this year a priority, and it's mostly working, but still slowed by Republican foot-dragging.
Senate Republicans have been thwarting the process in a number of ways, from refusing to provide Obama with candidates for nomination, as is traditionally considered part of their duty, and in holding back "blue slips," the traditional courtesy that allows home state senators to advance nominations in the Judiciary Committee. And when a nominee gets through committee, Republicans insist on using up every bit of debate time the rules currently allow them, making the process of confirming these nominees excruciatingly slow.
But last year's reforms are still helping move nominees, so Senate Democrats should be encouraged about enacting further reforms on nominations. They have two opportunities, short of the full-on nuclear option dealing away with filibusters entirely. Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy could forego the blue-slip process and get nominees through his committee more quickly. And Democrats could reform the Senate rules to limit the amount of time for debate on nominees. The "use it or lose it" reform would do just that—if Republicans aren't using debate time to actually debate a nominee, they forfeit it. These are some pretty commonsense reforms that could ease the ongoing crisis in judicial vacancies.
Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Mon Aug 04, 2014 at 11:55 AM PDT.