This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

So, since this site is about "more and better Democrats", I'm wondering what the hell to think about Hillary Clinton. While many leaders and politicians have weighed in on the militarized police tactics in Ferguson, Hillary has been ... SILENT.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Who HAS Weighed in on Ferguson?

I searched this list of Senate Dems on Twitter and found this:

Oh, And Rep Hank Johnson (D-GA)

Johnson sent fellow lawmakers a letter stating that he plans to introduce the Stop Militarizing Law Enforcement Act. The act would end the DOD's 1033 program that sends surplus military equipment to local police forces.

“Our main streets should be a place for business, families, and relaxation, not tanks and M16s,” Mr. Johnson wrote. “Unfortunately, due to a Department of Defense (DOD) Program that transfers surplus DOD equipment to state and local law enforcement, our local police are quickly beginning to resemble paramilitary forces.”

Lest you think that this bill is in response to Ferguson directly, Rep Johnson has reportedly been working on this bill for months. He co-authored an Op-Ed in The USA Today in March.

Something potentially sinister is happening across America, and we should stop and take notice before it changes the character of our country forever. County, city and small-town police departments across the country are now acquiring free military-grade weapons that could possibly be used against the very citizens and taxpayers that not only fund their departments but who the police are charged with protecting.
This was published five months before the events in Ferguson.

What HAS Hillary Been Weighing In On?

Well, there is this article in Mother Jones titled "Who Said It: Hillary Clinton or John McCain?". The answers are surprising.

There is also this article in The Atlantic where she practically announced her candidacy. It is a good read, especially if you want to get a sense of how hawkish she plans to be or how far to the right she will go in the primaries.


"I’ve always been in the camp that held that they did not have a right to enrichment. Contrary to their claim, there is no such thing as a right to enrich. This is absolutely unfounded. There is no such right."
On The Middle East in general:
Jihadist groups are governing territory. They will never stay there, though. They are driven to expand. Their raison d'être is to be against the West, against the Crusaders, against the fill-in-the-blank—and we all fit into one of these categories. How do we try to contain that?
On Foreign Policy:
I’m thinking a lot about containment, deterrence, and defeat. You know, we did a good job in containing the Soviet Union, but we made a lot of mistakes, we supported really nasty guys, we did some things that we are not particularly proud of, from Latin America to Southeast Asia, but we did have a kind of overarching framework about what we were trying to do that did lead to the defeat of the Soviet Union and the collapse of Communism.

That was our objective. We achieved it.

Hey! It was good enough for Charles Krauthammer!

Where Do We Go From Here?

The question about Hillary will be fought over and over again here at the Great Orange Satan in the next two years. The factions will form: pro-Hillary voters, PUMAs, hardliners for Hillary, anyone BUT Hillary, etc. The fights will be ugly. We will all long for the days of simple pie fights.

I am no fan of Hillary for President. I will not be canvassing, caucusing, voting or blogging in her favor. I hope to find another candidate set that will themselves apart from the field next year. I pray that I will find someone who at least espouses the
progressive values I hold dear.

I am not worried about a candidate that has to swing right for votes. I do not feel that the triangulation that worked so well for Bill Clinton is necessary this time around. Even if Rand Paul wins the Republican nomination, I don't think that our party needs Hillary to hold the White House for the Democrats.

Give me Warren. Give me Booker. Give me Hank Johnson.

Give me Anybody But Hillary.

Extended (Optional)


too soon?

60%3 votes
0%0 votes
20%1 votes
20%1 votes

| 5 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.