This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

(Promoted by MissLaura)

Thus far, I’ve been riding the fence on the “cut the funding” debate.  But no more.  Not after listening to that moron, our President, on TV this morning.  After listening to him bumble his way through another public appearance, I’m convinced that, whatever the cost politically, the Democrats must now move to cut funding for the war in Iraq.

As a soldier who’s served in both theaters of this war, I’m often asked whether I think a freeze on war funding would hurt the soldiers.  I usually respond rationally by saying something like, “No, but it could hurt them in the long term if such a move were to cost the Democrats the elections in 2008.”  Well, I don’t think this is the time for long-term planning anymore.  I’ve played the pros and cons of cutting funding over and over in my head for months, and I am now convinced that a cessation of funding is the only way to stop this lunatic.  Cutting funding will not endanger the troops.

Here’s why:

These are some of the arguments used against the idea of cutting funding:

It hurts Democrats politically

It might.  But I’m not really concerned with that at this point.  Call me short-sighted, but all I have to do is take one look at George W. Bush muddling his way through a question and answer session and I am convinced that the American people will be with me on this.  Note to policymakers reading this: Please take a gander at the latest poll numbers.

It endangers the troops

This is propaganda nonsense.  The House of Representatives could easily fashion a bill that halts any funding for the war on March 1, 2008.  Such a bill would fully fund the troops in harm’s way for the rest of the year—but it would force the President to begin the redeployment immediately.  How we, as Americans, have gotten it into our collective consciousnesses that cutting the funding could somehow “hurt the troops” is something I’ll never be able to figure out.  The Pentagon has some evil people that work within its halls, but the organization itself is not inherently evil.  If the funding were cut, the Defense Department would very quickly move to begin a safe and orderly * withdrawal.  I think back to when I was in Iraq and I wanted to come home.  Never once did it enter my mind that if the funding were cut, I would somehow be in more danger.  I mean, I was already there with soft-skinned humvees and only a single plate for my vest.    

*It hurts the troops’ morale

Go talk to a 22-year old father who’s been there for 13 months and who’s never seen his baby.  Ask him how ending the war would affect his morale.  Better yet, go ask him right after he’s survived his third IED and follow-on ambush.  Ask him an hour after it happens, while he can barely hold his cigarette because he’s still got the shakes from the fear and adrenaline.  “Hey, bub, how’s your morale?”  

It emboldens terrorists

Embassy bombings.  U.S.S. Cole.  9/11.  World Trade Center tumbling down on TV.  

Who the fuck came up with this talking point?  In case you missed it, the “terrorists” were pretty riled up before the invasion of Iraq.  And another thing I hate about this meme is that it is stated from a position of fear—the implication being that we will be in more danger if we leave.  Sigh.  So you’re telling me that if we pull out of Iraq, rebuild our military to its former strength, and re-focus on Afghanistan and Pakistan, we would be emboldening the terrorists?  I gotta tell you, if I were a terrorist, the thing I’d be most afraid of would be a fresh, rested, rebuilt, and focused American military.  If I’m a terrorist, I’m currently loving the fact that a beaten down and confused American Army is sitting at a standstill, stuck in the February mud of Iraq.  It makes my life easier.  

It will cause Iraq to fall into a bloody civil war in which regional players will involve themselves

Have I been sleeping?  Were we not at that point already?  How do these assholes on the right get away with continuing to say that on one hand, if we leave, it could cause other countries to step in, and on the other hand, to say that these other countries are already meddling in Iraq’s business?  Didn’t we just get a Powerpoint on that?

Bottom line: Cut the funding.  Pull the plug.  Take away the keys.  However you want to phrase it, it needs to be done soon.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Wed Feb 14, 2007 at 03:58 PM PST.


Cut the Funding:

92%8454 votes
7%725 votes

| 9180 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.