This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Where is the voice? Shame them
What should be done about scientists, who represent themselves as neutral parties but actually much benefit from corporate sponsorship of their research?


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

In 2005, William W. Clark, a hearing scientist at Washington University medical school, in St. Louis, published a study concluding that “firefighters are not at risk for occupational noise-induced hearing loss, even though they work nonstandard shifts and are occasionally exposed too high levels of noise.”  This study was presented as evidence by a siren manufacturer, Federal Signal Corp, the defendants in a massive class-action suit filed against them by firefighters who held that they had suffered hearing loss as result of their proximity to fire sirens.  
Dr. Clark failed to mention that he was a paid expert for Federal Signal Corp at the same time he conducted his study which was based on data gathered by the company.  Dr. Clark a Ph.D. and director of his medical school’s Audiology and Communication Sciences Program, on prior occasions has prepared other hearing loss studies related to the railroad and mining industries while these industries were also paying for him.
 Critics found serious flaws in Clark’s tainted work. An article in the journal Laryngoscope,  by Karl Kryter from the Stanford Research Institute states that “there were some serious flaws in the analyses of the data and the conclusions reached.”  Two years later after that, Dr. Clark published a study concluding that miners did not suffer significant occupational hearing loss his research was rebutted by the National Institute of Occupational Safety.

Washington University medical school released a letter saying that Dr. Clark hadn’t violated any university policies.
Clark is hardly alone. What should be done with scientists who sell their integrity and the health of their fellow human beings, for a bucket of gold? Post their pictures and addresses on a web page, called Shame? A sign on their offices and lab doors? A letter to their families? Where is the voice?

Amitai Etzioni most recent book is Security First; For a Muscular, Moral Foreign Policy   The official website is www.securityfirstbook.com
Sources Used:

Hard Case When Academics Double as Expert Witnesses by David Armstrong Wall Street Journal June 22, 2007 VOL CCXLIX NO. 145

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Amitai Etzioni on Wed Jun 27, 2007 at 10:08 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.