This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

This is what I've been waiting for from Senator Obama, a stand on FTA's during this campaign.  

Hillary Rodham Clinton's doubts about big foreign trade deals came only in the heat of the presidential campaign, Democratic rival Barack Obama said Tuesday, addressing labor leaders who strongly oppose many of the agreements. [snip]

"So, when a candidate rails against NAFTA today, it's fair to ask her where she was with NAFTA 20 years ago," said Obama. "You don't just suddenly wake up and say NAFTA is a terrible thing when you were for it before."

Obama made his case at a regional convention of the United Auto Workers just a day after Clinton used the same forum to call for a "time out" on new trade deals while their impact on American jobs is assessed.

Time out?  Over 20 million jobs sold down the river by the "people's party" under a Democratic administration and you all of a sudden want a "time out"?!?!?  Those millions of jobs replaced by much lesser paying jobs, resulting in increases in poverty in America, and you all of a sudden want a "time out"?!?!?  What a crock.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

I think I can fit in another excerpt under fair use rules:

In her speech, Clinton said she would be cautious on new trade agreements, but she carries the baggage of her husband's presidency during which NAFTA was negotiated and approved.


"I've been consistent. You can't say that about the other two major candidates," said Obama. "When a candidate says he opposes right-to-work laws or trade rules that hurt workers today, ask him where he's been before. Because America needs a president who will fight for you when it's hard, and not when it's politically convenient."


Free trade and NAFTA in particular, which was enacted with heavy pressure from Bill Clinton in 1993, is Bill and Hillary's Achilles' heel:  the selling down the river of American jobs, including technical jobs, which has national security implications, is inexcusable.  Bill and Hillary did it for their multinational political donors then and they'll do it again now.

They did it for their corporate donors then and they'll do it again now.

They did it for the people that fund Hillary's "centrist" DLC friend's careers, the people that have corrupted the political "Establishment" to such an extent that Republicans and Democrats in DC are roughly identical on economic issues, and they'll do it again now.  

DLC, DINO Democrats, the "old" Democrats, are in effect one and the same as Republicans and social divisions had been quite simply used to perpetuate the illusion that there is a difference between the two parties.

Talk is cheap Senator Obama, especially in this age of complicity with Republicans, but your record is clean on FTA's and now your rhetoric matches that clean record:  my ears are perking up.

Update I plead ignorance on the Peru FTA Senator Obama's support thereof.  I do indeed hope to hear some clarification from Senator Obama on this apparent discrepancy.....

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to a gnostic on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 06:00 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.