This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

A study released today in the online journal Health Affairs demonstrates that the time it takes for a patient to see an emergency physician has increased significantly between 1997 and 2004 (Waits To See An Emergency Department Physician: U.S. Trends And Predictors, 1997-2004). The authors, who looked specifically at adults waiting to be evaluated for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), noted some of the greatest increases were for blacks, Hispanics, and women:

Whites waited a median of twenty-four minutes, while blacks waited a median of thirty-one minutes and Hispanics, thirty-three minutes. Females waited slightly longer than males, a median of twenty-six minutes versus twenty-five minutes.
Below the cut: a few random observations from one doc's POV.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The authors determined that these racial differences had little to do with race and everything to do with urban vs. nonurban hospitals: "For patients ultimately diagnosed with AMI, the only significant interaction term was urban versus nonurban, with city patients' wait times increasing 11.6 percent faster per year." Thus, our urban hospitals are more broken than our nonurban hospitals. Of course, this may still be a symptom of racial bias in the public policies leading to these broken urban hospitals.

I heard about the study this morning, in Joanne Silberner's report on NPR. It's a good piece, and brief. I encourage you to listen to it. I was heartened by Dr. Art Kellerman's comment that Americans are focusing on the long wait times for elective surgery in the UK or Canadian systems, when they SHOULD be focused on wait times for true emergencies, like AMI. That's when wait times matter most. There, I gather, we don't fare as well as the folks in the UK or Canada (although Dr. Kellerman doesn't cite evidence). I'd like to martial the data for you, but it's late, I've spent the day seeing patients in my office, and I'm exhausted. I'm an ENT, not an ER physician, but we get tired, too.

One thing about Joanne Silberner's report really caught my ear. At the end, Dr. Kellerman apparently felt the need to drive the crisis home: "If you can't get a single heart attack patient to care in time, how are you going to handle hundreds or even thousands of victims of a terrorist strike?"

At this point, I did a "Whaaaaat?"

How the hell did terrorism enter into this discussion? Is terrorism the ultimate attention-getter? Is it the sine qua non for relevance? Or is it the 21st Century's equivalent of Godwin's Law?

Didn't Dr. Kellerman think the basic message was clear? People are waiting longer to be seen for a possible heart attack. You could die because of our broken system. (Yes, yes, survival data might have given this study greater impact. As it stands, we can only guess. But it's common sense, I think, that longer wait times will eventually bite us all in the ass.)

But no. He had to invoke the specter of a humongous terrorist attack.

I would love to see the odds ratio: chance of dying from a heart attack vs. chance of dying from a terrorist strike.

Sorry this diary is all over the map -- but I found it an interesting NPR piece, and an interesting study, and wanted to bring it to your attention. Thanks!

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Balls and Walnuts on Tue Jan 15, 2008 at 09:29 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.