This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I just listed to the excellent Tom Ashbrook on NPR discuss the Iowa results and he had to finally ask one of his guests, a Democratic talk show host, about John Edwards second place showing. No one had mentioned his name until then. There was a long pause and the guest finally said he did well and then launched into how the vote in Iowa was good for McCain.

The supporters of every candidate believe their choice doesn't get enough press or gets press that is unfairly biased against them. Among all leading candidates in both parties I think Edwards supporters have easily the most legitimate reason to complain.

The legitimate first story about Democrats is the Obama-Clinton finish. But the story of the person who came in second doesn't seem to be worth mentioning.

Why not?


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The last three Democrats to be elected President (Carter, Clinton, and Gore) were all Southerners and Edwards is the only Southerner in the race. That, one would guess, would be a positive thing for him, but it's not. With the isolated national media clan it's a major negative.

How, then, did Carter, Clinton and Gore get past this prejudice? By talking about specific issues and staking out reasonable positions. The public supported that and elected them, even as the clan universally and unrelentingly smeared (and continues to smear) them.

Edwards is different in one major respect: his major theme is incomprehensible to the clan. Two Americas? Corporate control? The clan reacts with a blank look and replies, "How 'bout that Obama-Hillary race!"

In the DailyKos polls Edwards is the run-away favorite and certainly the most progressive and non-business-as-usual candidate. Of all the major candidates in both parties if a voter is looking for change, Edwards is the obvious choice.

But what's the move? The Republicans flounce around with half a dozen weak and deeply flawed candidates, and that's newsworthy to the clan. The Democrats have three strong candidates but only two are newsworthy to the clan. How does Edwards change that? He has already taken good and solid positions on important issues such health care, the war, truth and justice, and even set the pace in rejecting Fox News.

Suppose he starts running for President, not for the primaries. Suppose he begins running against the Republicans, not other Democratic candidates. Suppose he starts hammering away at "the Republican Economy." As a theme it fits beautifully with his "Two Americas", and, equally important, it is the overriding issue for most people in the country and will only get more important between now and November. It would lift his candidacy and at the same time make his theme dominate the debates to the point where even the clan would have to pay attention. "The Republican Economy" "The Republican Economy" "The Republican Economy"

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to A Southerner in Yankeeland on Sat Jan 05, 2008 at 05:13 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.