This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

New York's bottle bill turned 25 last year. Fred LeBrun has an interesting column in Wednesday's Albany Times Union regarding an enhanced bottle bill that has been kicking around the NY legislature for a number of years. It has passed the NY Assembly but has been stalled in the Senate.

His column follows on the heels of an article by TU Capitol Bureau reporter Irene Jay Liu about the irony of the bottling industry, the current recipient of unclaimed container deposits [estimated to be $100M-$190M per year], funneling hundreds of thousands of $$ of that money to lobby lawmakers to keep the bill, which would direct unclaimed container deposits to the state's environmental fund, from succeeding.

Follow after the fold for a few thoughts.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

According to LeBrun,

On its face, the advantages of extending the nickel deposits to noncarbonated beverages like juice, iced tea and water outweigh anybody's negatives by a great deal. Foremost is that it's great social legislation, keeping pace with the greening of America and our ever-growing environmental consciousness. The history of the first bottle bill shows it has greatly reduced both litter and the waste flow into landfills. There's no reason to doubt a bigger better will have the same effect.
A quick visit to the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation website leads to a pdf entitled BEVERAGE CONTAINER DEPOSIT AND REDEMPTION STATISTICS As Reported For The Period October 1, 2004 - September 30, 2005. This document includes a table listing annual statistics from 1983-84 [the bill was passed in 1982] through 2004-05. Data are gathered from bottlers, brewers, and beverage distributors. Here are a few numbers from that table:
year redemp. rate glass [tons] alum. [tons] plastic [tons] total [tons]
04-05 66.0% 104,502 41,077 53,590 199,169
03-04 69.2% 106,956 42,042 54,849 203,846
02-03 69.2% 114,753 45,107 58,848 218,708
01-02 70.2% 121,878 47,908 62,502 232,288
00-01 69.8% 115,810 45,522 59,390 220,722
99-00 69.1% 110,993 43,629 56,919 211,541
98-99 71.9% 123,870 48,690 63,523 236,083
97-98 74.7% 115,327 45,332 59,142 219,801
96-97 76.1% 219,136 46,213 24,348 289,697
95-96 75.7% 211,070 44,512 23,452 279,034
94-95 77.6% 241,659 50,963 26,851 319,473
93-94 76.4% 245,210 51,712 27,246 324,168
92-93 76.5% 245,757 51,827 27,306 324,890
91-92 76.4% 250,112 52,746 27,790 330,648
90-91 75.7% 262,266 55,309 29,141 346,716
89-90 72.5% 252,833 53,320 28,093 334,246
88-89 71.6% 239,778 50,566 26,642 316,986
87-88 73.6% 249,669 52,652 27,793 330,114
86-87 77.0% 250,135 52,751 27,741 330,627
85-86 79.0% 258,519 54,519 28,724 341,762
84-85 80.1% 255,063 53,790 28,340 337,193
83-84 71.6% 154,809 32,648 17,201 204,658
Total 73.6% 4,250,105 1,062,835 839,431 6,152,370
The percentages for plastic and glass change after 97-98 because of changes in market share for those containers as plastics take a larger share.

The original bill has been a great success, keeping millions of tons of state refuse out of landfills as well as reducing greenhouse houses required to obtain the raw materials and manufacture containers from scratch. My cursory perusal of the web in support of this diary has led me to many sites touting the virtues of bottle deposits, even mentioning the public health benefits of fewer injuries from stray glass. With today's proliferation of non-soda/non-beer beverages like iced tea, sports drinks, and bottled water, NYDEC estimates the expanded bottle bill will recycle an additional 90,000 tons of materials every year at no cost to local governments while diverting unredeemed nickels to environmental programs.

Who could be against this? How about Joe Bruno, New York Senate Majority Leader, who opposed the original 1982 bill and has stalled any vote on the expanded bill. He considers container deposits an onerous "tax" on the consumer. It's no coincidence that the bottling industry has been a big contributor to Bruno's cause. According to a 2004 study by the New York Public Interest Research Group, between January 2002 and January 2004, the Republican Senate Campaign Committee, whose purse strings are held by Senator Bruno, was the recipient of $273,717 in contributions from opponents of the revised bottle bill. Representatives of the bottling industry also held a May 2007 fundraiser,

benefitting the Republican Senate Campaign Committee's housekeeping account, a soft-money conduit that skirts the state's annual maximum of $5,000 in contributions by any one corporation for New York elections.
Ironically, it might be a Republican who helps turn this bill around. According to LeBrun, State Sen. Carl Marcellino [R-Long Island], Chairman of the Environmental Conservation Committee,
has said he favors getting a bigger, better bill passed as a stand-alone, after the budget passes.


Senator Marcellino's seat on Long Island has been marked by Democrats as vulnerable. Over the years, Marcellino has been a stalwart in pushing environmental legislation. This year more than ever, he needs a bright feather for his war bonnet when he goes out on the stump. Like getting credit for expanding this bill, for example.

I have not been able to find any information about a potential Democratic challenger to Marcellino in November; in fact, a visit to the ActBlue site still showed NY-SD-05 Democratic candidate Leslie Bielanski, who lost to Marcellino in 2006.

The citizens of New York State are in favor of an enhanced bottle bill; according to NYPIRG, more than 500 groups, businesses, and local governments support the enhanced bill. Now is the time for people who live, work, and vacation in New York State to put pressure on Senators Bruno and Marcellino. Upstate NY is getting bluer and greener by the minute, and Joe Bruno's Republican majority in the State Senate is teetering with the slimmest 32-30 lead.

Contact Sen. Joe Bruno at bruno@senate.state.ny.us

Contact Sen. Carl Marcellino at marcelli@senate.state.ny.us

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to upstatetimmy on Fri Apr 04, 2008 at 10:10 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.