This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

It is done.  After days of anger glee conversation about the smart stupid decision by God Satan Barack Obama to cave reach out appear on Fox Faux News, the interview is in the books.  So let's skip the arguments on the pros and cons of appearing on Fox, because you've already staked out a position.  If you're an Obama supporter, it was a smart move that will broaden his appeal to independents and moderate Republicans.  If you're a Hillary supporter, it was a typical, spineless move on the part of Obambi.  And if you're a McCain supporter, go enlist.

Now, let's get to the interview itself, starting with a look at Chris Wallace's performance:

We'll ask him questions he's never faced before about his campaign...
The questions (paraphrased):
  • Why can't you close the deal?
  • How do you overcome being an elitist?
  • Won't being Black make it hard to get elected?
  • Has Hillary played the race card?
  • Rev. Wright, Rev. Wright, Rev. Wright, Rev. Wright, Rev. Wright, Rev. Wright,  Rev. Wright, Rev. Wright?
  • What you call distractions, we call values.  Respond.
  • William Ayers, William Ayers?
Mr. Wallace finished the interview with the questions that concern every American;  John McCain; maverick or super maverick? Republicans;  great ideas or the greatest ideas?  Taxes;  high or higher? Iraq;  cut, run or cut and run?  Debate with Hillary; scared or terrified?  

Yes, a complete departure from the usual vacuous, 'gotcha' questions we've been subjected to through 21 debates, weren't they?  But hey, what did you expect?  Fair and balanced?  After 12 years of Fox News, anyone who expected anything different has bigger problems than worrying about who will be the next leader of the most powerful country in the world.

And what about Barack Obama's performance?  Was it everything you had hoped for?  Again, like the question of doing the interview in the first place, it depends on where you stood before the interview took place.  "Real" progressives wanted fire and brimstone, with Obama reducing Wallace to a quivering blob, curled into the fetal position, which conversely, was what Hillary supporters and Fox News hoped would happen to Obama.  Obamaphiles wanted issue-oriented questions that would not only inform undecided voters, but would give Obama an opportunity to clearly lay out a strong, progressive plan for America.  In the end, no one really got what they wanted -- but most of them will claim they did.

One last point.  I would be remiss if I didn't mention the shout out that Daily Kos received during the interview. It seems that for some reason, the senator is less willing to take on our commenters than he is Chris Wallace. It's now been 922 days since his last visit. Is it time to borrow from Fox News and start our own "Obama Watch?"  After all, we never pushed the "Barack is a Muslim, Marxist, un-American, latte swilling, elitist" stories.  That should be worth something, right?  Or is that left?


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 09:20 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.