This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Posted by Bruce Bourgoine who blogs at
Kennebec Blues and Dirigo Blue.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The constitutional device in many states granting the ability of plebiscite rule through ballot measures, citizen initiatives, propositions, or peoples’ vetoes ought to be prohibited from regulating rights guaranteed or granted by legislation or judicial decision by federal and state governments.

It is improper and immoral to subject the rights of any minority to a vote of an electorate likely comprised of a majority larger than affected minority.  Unlike state constitutions, the United States Constitution does not provide for rule by referenda and through the “Guarantee Clause” (Article IV, Section 4), guarantees each state a “republican form of government”.  It defines and grants basic rights and liberties that have been further extended through legislation and clarified through judicial ruling.  

While the “Guarantee Clause” may not explicitly prohibit states’ referenda, applying such votes to determining the denial or reduction of basic rights that are Constitutionally granted though our “republican form of government” ought to be checked to give balance in the conflict of majority rule toward minority rights.

Imagine the outcomes of these hypothetical referenda:

- 1886; A referendum to allow free passage of Native American buffalo hunters throughout the Dakota Territory.

- 1920; A proposition to grant women suffrage in the United States.

- 1942; A ballot measure to safeguard Japanese American civil rights in California.

- 1964; A citizen initiative to end racial segregation in schools, public places, and employment in the United States.

- 2010; A people’s veto of a second piece of legislation granting civil marriage rights regardless of sexual orientation in Maine.

Putting taxation to a vote is one thing; placing individual rights in front of the electorate is entirely something else.  Tyranny of the majority is a too powerful and punitive force when it can take away the rights of any minority.  It is an extension of power that creates a classic check and balance Constitutional conflict.  It ought to be challenged to pursue prohibiting any referenda rule in favor of guaranteeing basic rights and liberties.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Bruce Bourgoine on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 06:58 PM PST.


Prohibit referenda on rights and liberties by states

79%23 votes
13%4 votes
6%2 votes

| 29 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.