OK

This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.

ATTENTION: READ THE RULES.

  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Welcome to the continuing diary series, "Let's Read a WHEE Book Together!" (a shameless rip-off of plf515's weekly "Let's Read a Book Together!"). This week, we'll be continuing with the chapter-by-chapter review of Mindless Eating, the 2006 book by researcher Brian Wansink.

WHEE (Weight, Health, Eating and Exercise) is a community support diary for Kossacks who are currently or planning to start losing, gaining or maintaining their weight through diet and exercise or fitness. Any supportive comments, suggestions or positive distractions are appreciated. If you are working on your weight or fitness, please -- join us! You can also click the http://www.dailykos.com/... tag to view all diary posts.
Intro

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think, by Brian Wansink
Chapter Two: The Forgotten Food

Stomachs don't count calories - PEOPLE count calories.

That's the message of Chapter Two. Your stomach doesn't really know how many calories you've eaten. That is, provided you're an adult American - but more about that later. In his opening paragraphs, Wansink tells us that we overeat because we don't really attend to how much we've eaten. Without external visual cues, in fact, we have a tendency to continue eating well past the point of satiety.

What sort of visual cues tell us we've eaten enough? The first example Wansink presents is the of the Chicken Wing Study:

(the results of the Wing Study are found in the latter portion of the above video)

In the original wing study (as told in the book), a group of grad students were invited to an all-you-can-eat Buffalo Wing feast at a sports bar on Super Bowl Sunday. The students were free to serve themselves from an open buffet of chicken wings, and were able to go back for more during the game. There were bowls at each table to hold the wing bones. During the course of the game, waitresses collected the bowls and replaced them with empty bowls -- but only at half of the tables. At the other tables, the bowls containing the evidence of the fowl deeds (sorry) were not picked up, providing a mute reminder of how many wings had been consumed.

After the game, Wansink and his team of in-the-know grad students weighed the bones from each table. As you would expect (if you're familiar with some of Wansink's other studies), the grad students who didn't have the leftover bones as reminders ate more - an average of seven wings per person, versus five wings per person at the "boneyard" tables. A difference of two wings doesn't sound like a lot, and at about 100 calories per wing, that's only a difference of a couple hundred calories -- but 200 additional calories per day translates to a weight gain of 20 pounds per year.

In Rethinking Thin, Gina Kolata notes that the home bathroom scale only became commonly available in the early 20th century. How did people know whether they'd gained weight before scales came into wide (no pun intended) use? They probably used a method many people still use today - judge by the fit of their clothes. Wansink provides a story of a Midwestern sheriff, who noticed that the county jail inmates under his care were putting on 20 pounds or more during their incarcerations, most of which were less than a year. When asked what they thought was the cause of their weight gain, most inmates blamed the loose-fitting orange jump suits they were given to wear.

After the short "fat clothes" diversion, Wansink returns to the idea of visual cues. We don't eat calories, he says - we eat volume. Penn State researcher Barbara Rolls performed an experiment in which two groups of students were given strawberry smoothies half an hour before lunch. However, the smoothies served to one of the groups had an additional ingredient. The students in this group ate 12 percent less lunch, and reported feeling less full. What was this magical mystery ingredient? It was air - the smoothies were blended until the volume was doubled. Based on her research, Rolls wrote The Volumetrics Eating Plan. As Wansink explains it, if you think you need a hamburger that takes two hands to hold in order to feel full, it doesn't really matter whether that "two-hand" bulk comes from two fatty beef patties or a pile of lettuce and tomato slices - so dress it up with the bulky vegetable fixings and you'll eat fewer calories.

And while you're at it, eat more slowly. Studies have shown that it takes about 20 minutes for the feeling of fullness from the stomach to be registered by the brain. Unfortunately, the typical fast food meal is finished in around 11 minutes, unless we're lunching with friends.

After discussing the effects of volume and duration (the "space-time continuum" as applied to dieting), Wansink describes what is probably his most (in)famous experiment, the Bottomless Soup Bowl.

The Bottomless Soup Bowl experiment took place in the Spice Box, the experimental restaurant dining room sponsored by the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Wansink and his fellow researchers arranged four 18-oz soup bowls around a table. Two of the bowls were connected to food-grade tubing, which was connected in turn to six-quart vats of Campbell's Tomato Soup. The vats were kept out of sight, and the height was adjusted so that the level of soup in the bowls was at the same height as the liquid in the vats. As the diners ate their soup, the trick bowls refilled, but not to the top. Rather, the level dropped, providing some indication that progress had been made. As Wansink tells it, there were a few kinks to be worked out, and not just in the tubing:

Of the 62 people who showed up for lunch, only two discovered what was occurring. One bent down to retrieve a dropped napkin, and quickly pointed out the Borg-like tubing under the table to the rest of his lunch companions. The second person had a much more dramatic experience. Forgetting for a moment that he was not at a medieval banquet, this man picked up the bowl to drink out of it as if he were channeling one of his Viking ancestors. It made a loud gurgle and the tomato soup-filled tube slithered up through the table like a coral snake. This made the woman next to him shriek, and the man across from him tipped over his chair in his haste to escape. These two people and their companions were dropped from the study. None of the other 54 suspected a thing.
To me, there is an interesting lesson to be drawn from the Bottomless Soup Bowl. As you know if you've been reading my earlier WHEE diaries, Dr. David Kessler argued in his book The End of Overeating that the American food industry is making processed food irresistible through the addition of sugar, fat, and salt. What the Bottomless Soup Bowl shows is that sugar and fat (at least) aren't necessary to keep us eating more and more. In fact, the diners with the trick bowls at the Spice Box ate more than 50% more soup on average. Wansink says that some ate more than a quart of soup! That's three times what the diners with the normal bowls ate.

For Wansink, the most important lesson is that we aren't good at estimating the number of calories in our food. The "normal" diners underestimated their calories by about 20 percent - they thought they'd eaten around 123 calories, but had actually consumed over 150. The other diners thought they'd eaten 127 calories,  but they'd actually consumed 268 calories on average - their estimates were off by over 100 percent. Yet most of the bottomless bowl diners reported feeling no more full than did the others.

Wansink then refers to other studies to show that the 20% underestimate is not just an artifact of his experiment. In fact, the 20% is a typical underestimate - for normal-weight people, that is. Overweight and obese people underestimate their calorie by 30, 40, or even 50%. But these studies are not common knowledge:

Scientists, physicians, and counselors have often blamed overweight people for trying to fool others (or themselves) about how much they're eating. Some dieticians, physicians, and family members tell them flat out that they're "lying" or "in denial." Hurtful accusations like these only make diet counseling effective at scaring off overweight people, rather than changing them.
Why are overweight people more inaccurate in their estimates? Wansink suggests that in fact, everyone is less accurate at estimating calories as meals get larger. In fact, says Wansink:
It seems that when estimating almost anything--such as weight, height, brightness, loudness, sweetness, and so on--we consistently underestimate things as they get larger...That Popsicle-stick skinny person eating a 2,000-calorie Thanksgiving dinner will underestimate how much he's eaten by just as much as the heavy person eating a 2,000-calorie pizza dinner. The trouble is that the heavy person tends to eat a whole lot more large meals.
Reengineering Strategy #2:
See All You Eat

As I noted in my previous diary, Wansink closes each chapter with a healthy eating strategy related to the lessons of the chapter. This chapter's strategy is a two-part strategy:

"See it before you eat it"
Rather than eating from a Bottomless Bowl of tomato soup - or worse yet, a Bottomless Bowl of ice cream or candy - preplate your food. Decide how much you're going to eat, take it out of the larger container, and put it in a smaller container before you eat it. Make it easy to see the level going down, like the subjects in the Spice Box who had the normal bowls, rather than the Bottomless Bowls.

"See it while you eat it"
Or rather, keep the empties visible while you're deciding whether to have more. If you're eating chicken wings, keep the bones on your plate while you decide whether to have seconds. The same applies to beverages, says Wansink. If you're serving wine at your dinner party,

...keep the empty wine bottles on the table and pour refills into fresh glasses, without clearing the others. This should help stretch your supply of North Dakota wine.
Scheduled WHEE diaries:  
March 14
  Sun AM - louisev  (weekly diary)
  Sun PM - WHEE Open

March 15
  Mon AM - NC Dem
  Mon PM - WHEE Open

March 16
  Tues AM - WHEE Open
  Tues PM - WHEE Open

March 17
  Weds AM - WHEE Open
  Weds PM - Edward Spurlock (Kolata, Ch. 5)

March 18
  Thur AM - WHEE Open
  Thur PM - WHEE Open

March 19
  Fri AM - WHEE Open
  Fri PM - WHEE Open (Wee Mama on hiatus)

March 20
  Sat AM - bloomin (weekly diary)
  Sat PM - Edward Spurlock (Wansink, Ch. 3)

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Edward Spurlock on Sat Mar 13, 2010 at 08:08 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.