This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Residents of Idaho and Montana are hastily gearing up for a battle against Imperial Oil/ExxonMobil. The Kearl Module Transport Project is their plan to move huge Korean-made equipment through Idaho and Montana on it's way to the tar sands of Alberta.

Some of Imperial Oil's 200 or more loads, to be transported weeknights over the course of a year, will be as high as a three-story building, as wide as a two-lane highway and nearly three-quarters of a football field in length.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The effects of the Kearl Module Transport Project on Montanans is described by the Clark Fork Coalition.

We may have to say goodbye to quiet, pristine mornings on the river. Instead, imagine the noise, the wildlife fatalities, the threats to water quality, the traffic snarls, the obstructed views, and the inevitable hits to recre[a]tion-based, amenity-rich local economies if a proposal from ExxonMobil goes through.  So far, the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) has produced only a brief Environmental Assessment (EA) on the proposal for a 'High and Wide' Transportation Corridor in western Montana.  And unfortunately, the EA is an inadequate and short-sighted document on many fronts, starting with its portrayal of the project.
The MDT released the EA on April 8. A 30-day comment period began April 14, which leaves little time for concerned citizens to respond.

From the Missoulian article

Missoula attorney Bob Gentry and others are pushing first to extend the public comment period beyond May 14. They want MDT to call for a more involved, lengthy and expensive federal Environmental Impact Statement.
Gentry, who worked for MDT's legal services division until last summer, said no matter what, you're not going to stop ExxonMobil from mining the tar sands of Alberta, a 50-year project that involves virtually every major oil extraction company.

What the company is trying to do is "externalize" costs on a shorter transportation route from Korea, where the massive pieces of equipment are prefabricated, Gentry said. Is it fair that the people of Montana end up bearing part of those costs?

"If there are alternate routes that cost them more money but are less impactful to the people of the state of Montana than building a permanent high-wide corridor up Wild and Scenic rivers, and up the Blackfoot River, and up the beautiful Front Range of Montana, then make them pay more to do that because it's not worth it to us," Gentry said.

The Clark Fork Coalition is calling for a broader study of the proposal, as well.
The EA only considers a 12-month time period where 2 loads per day will be moved for a year beginning this fall.  However, because the Kearl Oil Sands Project is expected to be active through 2060, we believe limiting the EA to a one-year time period with the proposed parameters doesn't take into account the real potential for decades of use and does nothing to guarantee that the shipments will be constrained to the "off-hours."  Other entities involved in the project are at least acknowledging that we're not talking about a one-time deal here.  The Port of Lewiston anticipates that "If one oil company is successful with this alternate transportation route, many other companies will follow their lead."  It is obvious that this route is planned to be a permanent industrial corridor to be in use for the forseeable future.
And this is the point: 'high-wide' transportation corridors already exist. They require extra sea and overland travel, but the cost of the shorter alternative is just too great.

Northern Rockies Rising Tide is working to block passage through Montana.

The proposed route begins in international waters, comes up the Columbia and Snake Rivers to the Port of Lewiston, and from there moves along the Lochsa river, up over Lolo pass, through Missoula and up the Blackfoot River to the Port of Sweetgrass.
The impact of this proposed route begins in Idaho along the Lochsa River
, a Wild and Scenic River. And it's a beauty.

The Lochsa River Conservancy has a facebook page with links and information about the River and the plan to widen the highway to move the heavy equipment.

The Lochsa River Conservancy's cause is simple: we don't want the beautiful wild and scenic corridor of the Lochsa to be developed as an international truck route. The area was set aside as wild and scenic in order to keep it undeveloped, to allow tourists, locals, and others a beautiful experience along one of the most remarkable rivers in the Western US.
The Missoulian article doesn't mention it, but the proposed route includes US 12 along Lolo Creek, from the Idaho border to Lolo, MT at US 93. Lolo Creek is a beauty, too:

Lolo Creek

It is hard to imagine the scale of modification of two-lane mountain highways required to accommodate these big rigs.

This is what we need:

We are urging MDT to take a much closer look at this project by requiring an Environmental Impact Statement on the creation of this industrial corridor in Montana.  We also want to see coordination with the federal permitting entities involved in this project through the NEPA process.  We are asking that the EIS:

    * Conduct a programmatic review for the establishment of this permanent industrial corridor;
    * Require real alternatives to be considered;
    * Provide an economic analysis that accurately weighs the impacts to our recreation and tourism industry;
    * Coordinate with DEQ and the federal permitting agencies to properly analyze the transportation project as a whole under both the Montana and National Policy Acts

The Western Montana public meeting regarding the Kearl Module Transport Project is today:
Thursday, April 29, 2010 Open House: 6:00 p.m., Presentation and Public Hearing: 6:30 p.m. Meadow Hill Middle School, Old Gymnasium, 4210 Reserve Street, Missoula, MT
The Clark Fork Coalition provides mail or email contacts for submitting comments to the MDT here. They provide helpful talking points.
Or, submit comments through the MDT link. Sign a petition to stop this proposed equipment movement through Idaho and Montana (the latter petition is on the Northern Rockies Rising Tide web page.)
Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to hold tight on Thu Apr 29, 2010 at 08:53 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.