This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:


A year ago today, the Obama administration promised a radical overhaul of the nation’s immigration detention system in response to a wave of reports revealing widespread and egregious violations of the basic rights of detained immigrants. Changes to date have been too slow and tinker only at the edges of the problem. Worse, the pipeline to immigration detention is growing: the Obama administration has lifted deportations to historic highs.  This ensures that hundreds of thousands of immigrants will face months, and sometimes years, of detention in remote parts of the country and miles from loved ones. This is not the change we had hoped for.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

To be sure, the immigrant detention system in this country was broken long before the Obama administration. However, his administration has not done enough to ameliorate the abuses suffered by immigrants placed in this sprawling system, which spans across the country and houses nearly 400,000 immigrants each year. These immigrants are routinely denied access to their lawyers or loved ones, and often restricted from seeing the light of day. Furthermore, in the past year, journalists have uncovered horrific accounts of medical negligence and sexual abuse in this system, sometimes in the very detention centers the Obama administration has attempted to improve. This is not what a reformed system looks like.

It’s time to reform the immigrant detention system as we have come to know it, and look for solutions that are humane, economically sound, and in line with our constitutional values. Washington has the power to create a civil system by following two simple steps:

  2. Make the use of alternatives to detention commonplace, rather than a rarity. The Obama administration has rightly signaled that the detention system must be transformed into a truly “civil” system.  Yet, the administration has failed to turn the system into to one that always asks first whether an individual can remain in their community rather than being shipped off to a detention facility miles, or often states, away from their homes. The vast majority of immigrants detained in this system are not flight risks—they are fighting for their right to remain in the United States with their loved ones— yet they are treated as such.   
  3. Create a set of legally enforceable standards for detention. Currently, detention facilities face no real penalty for denying their detainees their most basic rights, like access to the outdoors or a law library. Without giving detention standards the legal teeth they need, those running the prisons will feel no real pressure to ensure that the rights of their detainees are not routinely violated.

The administration tried to duck the need for legally enforceable standards, touting their review system as sufficient to monitor and correct the activities of their detention facilities. This review system has long since failed to protect the basic rights of immigrants—just ask the victims of sexual abuse at the Hutto Detention Facility in Texas, or detainees in Basile, Louisiana, who suffered such horrific conditions that they staged a hunger strike in order to make their voices heard.

To be fair, the Obama administration has taken a few critical steps toward improving conditions for detainees. Last month, ICE implemented the first-ever electronic detainee locator system to allow people to find their loved ones in the immigration detention maze.  If the system works, the days where a wife can’t find her husband in the labyrinth of the detention system should be a thing of the past.  We should expect no less.

The administration must not let another year pass before making good on its promise of real reform. It is cold comfort to ask the actual immigrants being detained—or their families— to wait for reform. Tell that to the child missing her father, the husband missing his wife, or the man whose cancer goes untreated while in detention.

Creating a system that protects these civil detainees from egregious abuse wouldn’t require a major legislative effort, nor would it be costly for the taxpayer. These common-sense changes to the immigrant detention system have been proposed by Congress, and the administration could easily enact some of these changes without legislation.  The time has come for real accountability—Washington must act to codify legally enforceable standards to protect the basic human rights of the men and women in its care.

*Karen Tumlin is a Managing Attorney at the National Immigration Law Center (NILC). Currently she is litigating cases challenging state anti-immigrant ordinances and federal immigration detention policies.  Her practice also includes litigation on due process, detention, and employment issues. Ms. Tumlin holds a juris doctor degree and a master of public policy from the University of California at Berkeley.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to ImmigrationPolicyCenter on Fri Aug 06, 2010 at 09:48 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.