This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Unreal! Time to contact your Senators, people! I know it's late in the day, but a few phone calls letting your Senators know that stopping corporate polluters from wrecking America is a GOOD THING doesn't hurt.

    Sources on and off Capitol Hill are expecting the Senate Appropriations Committee to vote on an amendment to undercut Environmental Protection Agency climate change regulations when it marks up the agency’s annual spending bill.

     Such an amendment has a serious chance of passing given widespread backing on the issue from Republicans and moderate Democrats — so much so that environmentalists were asking committee leaders to punt on the markup entirely.


Bold text added by the diarist
More below the fold, and a call to action

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Crossposted at The Progressive Electorate.com

    In the same year when BP caused the worst environmental disaster in US history, this shouldn't even be a consideration in a Democratically controlled Senate. Massey Energy had a huge disaster too, in case we have forgotten. And that is just what we see on the surface. The last thing we need is a gutted EPA!

    Now, for those who remember Sen. Murkowski's resolution to gut the EPA from earlier this year, the following won't be a surprise. A similar amendment died in committee in the house on a 7-7 tied vote. In my opinion, it is imperative that we call and email Democratic Senators to let them know that we NEED the EPA, especially when the next BP oilpacolypse might be just around the corner! Hell, despite the hype, the BP oilpacolypse hasn't exactly gone away, has it?

Proof that bipartisanship is just a word for when they are BOTH fucking you. . . .

   Several other senators are in position to offer an EPA-related amendment in Murkowski’s place, such as longtime agency critic Kit Bond (R-Mo.) and Democratic Sens. Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Senate sources said Monday.

     Landrieu was an original co-sponsor of Murkowski’s EPA resolution. And Dorgan and Nelson have signed onto Democratic Sen. John Rockefeller’s bill to halt the EPA regulations for two years. Typically, amendments offered on appropriations bills affect agency matters only for the fiscal year the spending measure is for, so it’s unclear how senators will try to address the climate regulations.


Bold text added by the diarist

   Way to go, Senator Rockefellar! Halting EPA regulations for 2 years is a great idea, FOR ME TO POOP ON!

    We need to get in the ear of our representatives in the -House of Corporate Lords- Senate. Tell them we JUST SAW BP WRECK OUR ENVIRONMENT, the last thing we need is a gutted EPA!

   Contact your Senator RIGHT NOW with this link
    And tell your Senator we NEED a capable, well funded EPA! It's not like there's been a shortage of oil spills or coal mining accidents in 2010! And there is no guarantee that there won't be any more accidents next year.
Time for some action, guys and gals! So who is with me?

Peace to you and yours . . .

Image Hosting by PictureTrail.com

You can follow me on Twitter @JesseLaGreca

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to MinistryOfTruth on Mon Sep 13, 2010 at 05:42 PM PDT.


Do we need the EPA?

11%53 votes
45%215 votes
36%173 votes
6%29 votes

| 470 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.