This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I watched this debate on CSPAN.  I read the live blogs by Jed Lewison and askew.  Harry Reid cleaned her clock.

Of course thats not how the MSM will report it.  I'm sure CNN and their 14 person expert panels will analyze it and come to the conclusion that it was a tie.  There were enough comments on this site even that suggest many here thought she at least did well enough to tie, because she didn't stutter or claim Mexican muslim communists were infiltrating the State Department and fictional town of Frankford, Tx.

But come on.  There were two people in this debate.  One was a senior statesmen, who clearly understands policy and communicates it an accurate, albeit sometimes boring kind of way.  He will legislate, negotiate, and work for the interests of Nevadans and Americans. The other person is a teabagging amateur who has no clue what the F she is talking about.  She will grandstand, make occasional embarrasing comments, and do whatever Sen. DeMint tells her to for the next six years.  


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

I pride myself on being able to pick up on people's body language, tone of voice, and speech patterns when they are public speaking.  I can tell fairly quickly when someone is uncomfortable, ignorant of the topic they are presenting on, and bullshitting.  Angle's posture was awkward indicating she didn't want to be up there.  She didn't stumble over words, but she did stumble over sentences - bouncing from one topic to the next awkwardly and without reason.  It was clear she has no deep understanding of the policies she supports.  If this is not clear to the independent and moderate (sane) Republicans in Nevada, then I've lost hope in humanity.

There's a number of teahadists in this election and past elections and all have had their moments of stupidity and ignorance.  But each I think brings a different personality to their crazy right-wing views:

  • Sarah Palin: plays the folksy, anti-intellectual character.  doesn't know anything about policy, but can work a crowd
  • Rand Paul: too smart for his own good.  he tries to make the world fit into his extreme Milton Friedman libertarian view of the world
  • Christine O'Donnell:  says crazy shit for shock value, but in a charming kind of way.
  • Michelle Bachmann: says crazy shit for shock value, but in a I'm really sinister kind of way.
  • Sharron Angle:  just plain stupid.

Yes, thats the conclusion I've come to about Sharon Angle.  No ulterior motives or hidden agenda behind her.  She wants to privatize social security and save it at the same time.  She wants Americans to have a choice of health care plans like federal employees do, but is against the health care bill that gives Americans a choice of plans like federal employees have.  She wants to criticize Harry Reid for unemployment, then tell him its not his job to create jobs.  She sees nothing contradictory about any of these statements.  

Sharron Angle: just plain stupid for Senate.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to The Clevelander on Thu Oct 14, 2010 at 09:15 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.