This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

by Lisa Pearlstein
Fellow, National Women's Law Center
Cross-posted from NWLC's blog Womenstake

After watching the Mad Men Finale, I wanted to write a blog about Joan and her decision not to have an abortion.  Joan was lucky in this TV version of life in the 60’s; she had access to and could afford a New Jersey doctor that performed abortions in a safe environment.  While this option may have been available for Joan, I decided to dig deeper and illuminate what life was really like for a woman who sought abortion care in the 1960’s.  


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

In this pursuit, I came across a CBS Reports documentary entitled “Abortion and the Law,” hosted by Walter Cronkite.  The documentary focused on social conditions in 1965 when abortion was illegal in all fifty states.  Cronkite did not stigmatize abortion, but looked at laws prohibiting abortion with a critical eye.  He explained that “the illegal termination of pregnancy has reached epidemic proportions in this country.  The laws which govern abortion are broken an estimated one million times a year,” and “as long as the abortion laws remain unchanged, abortion will continue to be a critical problem.”  In Cronkite’s view, laws prohibiting abortion do not reduce the need for abortion care, and laws must be changed so that women can access abortion services in a safe environment.

Producers put a face to the epidemic by interviewing women who had illegal abortions.  One woman who was interviewed developed a dangerously high fever after she had her pregnancy terminated with a hanger in a hallway apartment.  Another woman went to a man who, in the middle of the abortion, extorted her husband to pay him more money.  Physicians also suffered from the laws, as they had to turn away desperate patients knowing that the patients would get unsafe abortions.  These interviews made it clear that in spite of laws prohibiting abortion, many women resorted to and were tragically harmed by unsafe and illegal abortions.

Cronkite’s report was captivating.  This is in part because he told real-life stories of women who were treated as criminals for having illegal abortions, did not know where to go for abortion care, or were harmed from so-called “back alley abortions.”  However, this report was equally fascinating because Cronkite, arguably the most trusted man in America, had a candid discussion about the need for safe abortion care even before the procedure was legalized in Roe v. Wade.  

Like Cronkite in 1965, the media should have a discussion about abortion and call for laws that support women’s reproductive rights.  In doing so, it should highlight stories of women that faced obstacles in accessing abortion care.  The media should also discuss why women may elect or need to have an abortion, and the harmful consequences that anti-choice laws and rhetoric have on women and their medical care.  In this conversation, Cronkite’s report should serve as a reminder of the epidemic our country will likely face if Roe v. Wade is overturned.  The discourse in “Abortion and the Law”Abortion and the Law should be continued today, as it is essential in upholding Roe v. Wade and gathering even more support for a woman’s right to decide whether to have an abortion.

To watch “Abortion and the Law,” go to: http://www.cbsnews.com/...

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to National Women's Law Center on Fri Nov 05, 2010 at 07:59 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.