This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

The biggest shocker of Election Day 2010 is now official, and the GOP's tally of Democratic seats flipped now rises to 62:

In a surprise upset in southern Texas, Blake Farenthold, a former radio show co-host with no prior experience in politics, has officially beaten Rep. Solomon Ortiz, a Democrat who had held his seat in the 27th district since 1982...“Although I gained votes during the manual recount, I did not surpass my opponent’s lead,” Mr. Ortiz said in a prepared statement. “Therefore, with great respect and admiration in the democratic process, I congratulate my opponent, Mr. R. Blake Farenthold, in his election to the 27th Congressional District of Texas in the U.S. House of Representatives.”
Ortiz was just the highest-profile victim in what was a disastrous night for Democrats in Texas in general, and Latino Democrats in Texas in particular. Not only did Ortiz fall to defeat, but so did Ciro Rodriguez in the 23rd district, which also reaches into the Rio Grande Valley. At the state legislative level, the news was just as bad.  Three Democrats representing heavily Latino areas in South Texas (Solomon Ortiz Jr, Abel Herrero, and Yvonne Gonzales-Toureilles) all were beaten. Also, Democrat Rene Nunez, who represented much of the Rio Grande Valley on the state Board of Education, was upset by his Republican challenger.

The preferences of Latino voters in Texas do not seem to have changed dramatically in recent years. Comparing the 2006 Senate exit polls (since Rick Perry faced three challengers that year) to the 2010 gubernatorial exit polls, we see that both KBH and Perry ran about 15-20 points behind their statewide totals among Latino voters.

So, what happened? It looks like Texas Latino voters stayed home in far greater number than their Anglo (and infinitely more conservative) counterparts.

This isn't reflected in the exit polls: the exits claim that Latinos made up 27% of the 2010 electorate, as opposed to just 15% of the 2006 electorate. But the numbers, as you can see, simply don't match up. Consider the drop off in the heavily Latino 27th Congressional district from the 2008 with the two most heavily Anglo districts in the state (the 4th and the 8th):

Turnout comparsion, Texas Congressional Districts, 2006--2010 (percentage in parentheses is the percentage difference between 2010 and 2006)

TX-04 (79% white): 165,269--186,116 (+12.6%)
TX-08 (80% white): 157,058--202,798 (+29.1%)

TX-27 (67% Hispanic): 109,314--106,480 (-2.6%)

The belief that Texas would eventually evolve into a swing state, or even a blue state, was predicated on the state's growing Latino political influence. 2010 was clearly a significant bump in that evolution.

The Democratic Party, both in Texas and nationwide, would be well served by figuring out why.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Tue Nov 23, 2010 at 06:40 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.