This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

     "Not as bad as W" is hardly high praise- - but more and more that seems to be the best that can be said about the presidency of Barack Obama. When the Republicans held the Congress and the White House, they took that as a mandate to aggressively shove their conservative agenda down the country's throat. Democrats were drowned out and relegated to the sidelines. What W (and Dick Cheney) wanted, he pretty much got.

Are we really doing better now? Time and time again we see policies watered down and compromised into uselessness. It's the Overton Window at work, and a DC establishment that is impervious to change. The latest disappointment looks to be science-based policy.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Obama has had 2 years with nominal Democratic control of the House and the Senate. Did we see anything comparable to the GOP bulldozer? Not even close. Partly that's inherent with Democrats. Even cats will come running when they hear the can-opener. Congressional Democrats faced the prospect of actually being able to carry out an agenda....blinked time and time again. President Obama reached across the aisle time and time again while kicking his own base in the.... well you know where - and got nothing except a bloody stump to pull back.

Guantanamo. Wiretapping. The wars. Health Care Reform. Climate Change on  the back burner. Tax cuts for the rich. Half steps and fall-backs. Bipartisan mush. Concession after concession. Values more notable for their absence than their implementation. Enabling of the worst behavior.

And now the latest disappointment is hope that the current administration will keep its promises to build policy on a foundation of solid science. An editorial by Peter Aldhous in New Scientist spells out the warning signs of yet another promise being eroded away.

A US government report on a pressing environmental issue is edited to falsely imply that scientists had peer-reviewed and supported the central policy recommendation. Almost 1 in 4 government scientists working on food safety say they have been asked by their bosses to exclude or alter technical information in scientific documents during the past year.

These incidents sound as if they come from the dark days of George W. Bush's presidency, when complaints about political interference in government science reached a crescendo. But in fact, both refer to the behaviour of the current US administration, led by a president who famously promised to "restore science to its rightful place" in his inauguration speech of January 2009.

Go read the whole thing. It hasn't gotten as much attention as some of the other disappointments we've suffered since the bright promise of January 2009 started to tarnish under the accumulation of actual performance, but it's part of the pattern where politics (and money) trump facts in DC. We have serious problems facing the country that can't be ignored, that can't be addressed without a solid foundation of the best science we can muster to buttress the policies we need. But not only is science getting shoved aside, those policies can't even get on the table for discussion.

"Facts are stupid things" - but not as stupid as politicians who think they can be ignored forever. Bush Lite is NOT the change we can believe in - but that's what we're getting.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to xaxnar on Sun Dec 05, 2010 at 07:27 AM PST.


Bush Lite:

18%3 votes
31%5 votes
18%3 votes
18%3 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes
12%2 votes

| 16 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.