This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Breaking news: According to the Los Angeles Times, the California Supreme Court will decide tomorrow whether the supporters of Proposition 8 have standing to appeal the federal court's ruling that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.

I'll be honest here, folks: I'm really torn. I don't know what I want to have happen tomorrow, or whenever they announce their decision.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

I can see both sides. Our side, with the dream team of Olson & Boies, showed definitively that the Prop 8 proponents have zero case and zero support, legally, for what they want: a ban on my marriage and the marriages of every other member of the California 18K club.

Based on quite a bit of case law, the proponents don't have standing by any reasonable measure to be the ones to appeal the federal court ruling, either.

While I would love, on the one hand, for the CA Supreme Court to say tomorrow "Sorry, Prop H8ers, you have no standing, go sit on it," which would effectively make the 9th Circuit say "Sorry, Prop H8ers, your precious little hatefest is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and you may not appeal it to SCOTUS," it would be in some ways immensely more satisfying to see it go all the way to SCOTUS and have - finally - every anti-marriage-equality law in the country struck down across the board, the way that anti-miscegnation laws were definitively struck down with the Loving v. Virginia decision in 1967.

On the other other hand, it would also be immensely satisfying to know that they were told "no, you can't have that cookie no matter how much you hold your breath, scream, throw a temper tantrum or stamp your feet." It would be immensely satisfying to know that they had no more legal recourse. It would make me happy to know that they finally have to STFU.

Even so, and regardless of how the CA SC decides, there will be no doubt be an appeal to SCOTUS from the H8ers: on the issue of standing, if the CA SC says that the Prop 8ers don't have it, and on the material facts of the case, if they do. So we will still have to wait a while for this to work its way through the national court system.

But I'm still hoping that, regardless, the H8ers will not get their way. And having seen the evidence on our side and the total lack of it on theirs, I'm pretty confident they won't.

Thoughts, comments, random words? Anyone? Bueller?

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Killer of Sacred Cows on Tue Feb 15, 2011 at 10:43 PM PST.

Also republished by Angry Gays.

Your Email has been sent.