This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

By Wendy Sefsaf

Late Friday night, the Utah Legislature passed three immigration-related bills that now go to the Governor for his signature or veto in the coming week. While some may be quick to celebrate Utah’s unique approach to immigration, others are left wondering whether these bills are all they’re cracked up to be.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The first measure (HB 497) is an SB1070-inspired immigration enforcement bill that would go into effect in early May if signed by the Governor. It presents many of the same concerns people had about Arizona’s SB1070—that it would allow local police to enforce federal immigration laws to the detriment of public safety, rack up high implementation costs, threaten racial profiling, and damage the state’s reputation.

The second bill (HB 116) establishes Utah’s own “guest worker program” which would take effect on July 1, 2013 or 6 months after the federal government grants Utah a “waiver,” whichever is sooner. It’s very unlikely that this provision is constitutional because only the federal government can grant visas and work authorization. No such waiver currently exists, and the question of whether or not the federal government would allow Utah to move forward remains uncertain. While Utah’s effort is creative, allowing each state to create its own guest worker program is not the federal solution that is needed.

The third bill (HB 466) authorizes the Governor of Utah to enter into a pilot-program with Mexican state Nuevo Leon to facilitate applications for migrant worker to come to Utah through the normal federal process.

However well-intentioned Utah legislators are in their approach to immigration, it does not appear that these three bills solve the larger problems facing Utah or other states. In fact, Utah may be opening a bigger can of worms than Arizona did last year.

While Utah’s early policy discussions were seemingly guided by the principles behind the much-lauded Utah Compact, questions remain on whether the end result is as revolutionary as the legislators behind it like to think it is.

The question of whether or not a guest worker program can be implemented at the state-level is difficult to answer. The immediate red flag here, however, is HB 497 and the harsh enforcement-only provisions that would be implemented beginning in May with no guarantee that the other parts of the compromise would be realized.

We can all agree that states are bearing the burden of a failed federal system, but state legislators should take great caution in taking these matters in their own hands.

Senate President Michael Waddoups reportedly said "We're set with immigration," after the bills passed Friday night. Well, the bad news is, passage of these bills is not the end of the story for Utah, it’s just the beginning.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to ImmigrationPolicyCenter on Mon Mar 07, 2011 at 02:03 PM PST.

Also republished by Utah Kos.

Your Email has been sent.