This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

I'll confess, I used to think supporting the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee was a good idea.  Ditto for the DCCC.  But then I realized that the primary interest of these groups is to keep their own team in charge and the welfare of the nation could go to hell, for all they care.  So, I'm more than tired of getting solicitations  for more money from the Senate Democrats every time the Republicans do something more outrageous than what prompted the begging letter the last time.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

Extortion.  That's what's being perpetrated every time a letter goes out with the message "send money, or the honorable Senator from so-and-so will whack your mother, your son or your favorite radio program."  It's the latter that's being held hostage this time around.

We should be trying to put Americans back to work, not trying to put public radio out of business.

That's what Harry Reid wrote and I agree, but note the subjunctive and that "we" is the subject of both clauses.  Harry's identifying with his colleagues and that's the problem.  They're all in the good cop/bad cop scenario together.  
(Maybe it's just their fund raising consultants that like this game, but it still sucks)
Harry goes on to say:
I’m not satisfied with playing defense.  Democrats are ready to move this country forward by investing in our future – rebuilding our infrastructure, improving our schools, and focusing on innovations that will create not just jobs, but entire industries.
Well, I'm not satisfied with Congress considering the stewardship of our nation's resources and assets a game.  

Then he says:

We’re ready to go on offense, waging a tough grassroots campaign to preserve our majority, standing strong with Democratic incumbents and recruiting top-flight challengers to take on vulnerable Republicans.
What's with this "ready" business?  Not to mention that there's a number of Democratic incumbents I can do without.  Claire McCaskill comes to mind, as did Blanche Lincoln the last time around.
For the record, the Dems in Class I, whose terms are up, are:

Akaka, Daniel K. (D-HI)
Bingaman, Jeff (D-NM)
Brown, Sherrod (D-OH)
Cantwell, Maria (D-WA)
Cardin, Benjamin L. (D-MD)
Carper, Thomas R. (D-DE)
Casey, Robert P., Jr. (D-PA)
Conrad, Kent (D-ND)
Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)
Gillibrand, Kirsten E. (D-NY)
Klobuchar, Amy (D-MN)
Kohl, Herb (D-WI)
Manchin, Joe, III (D-WV)
McCaskill, Claire (D-MO)
Menendez, Robert (D-NJ)
Nelson, Ben (D-NE)
Nelson, Bill (D-FL)
Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI)
Tester, Jon (D-MT)
Webb, Jim (D-VA)
Whitehouse, Sheldon (D-RI)

There's quite a few I can do without.  The Nelsons spring to mind, as does Kent Conrad and Joe Manchin, for a start.  But, targeting "vulnerable" Republicans has a very predatory sound.  Not edifying, Harry.  Not something I want to be associated with.  No money for you, DSCC.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to hannah on Thu Mar 24, 2011 at 09:14 AM PDT.

Also republished by The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.

Your Email has been sent.