This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

As someone whose morning bowl of Cheerios cannot be properly digested unless accompanied by a perusal of the comics page, I’ve been looking at the “funnies” for many decades. Because of its placement–on the comics page, just below the fold and within close range of the Sudoku puzzle–in my daily newspaper, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch [Yes, I still subscribe. Old habit.], I can’t avoid seeing “Mallard Fillmore.”

Last Friday, my longtime annoyance with the strip boiled over.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

In case you didn’t already know: Mallard Fillmore is a duck, portrayed as a TV reporter, who channels the strong conservative views of his creator, Bruce Tinsley. Mallard has been reporting his ideas since 1994, and is syndicated in 400 newspapers around the US. When it debuted, Tinsley called the comic strip an “antidote” to  Doonesbury, which is reviled among conservatives for its liberal viewpoint.

One big difference between the two comic strips is that, while conservatives managed to force Doonesbury off the comic page and onto the editorial page of many newspapers, including the Post-Dispatch, Mallard has kept its reserved spot in the P-D’s neighborhood of “Mother Goose and Grimm,” and directly above distinctly non-political “Hi and Lois” and “Beetle Bailey.” And, while Doonesbury conveys so-called liberal ideas via subtlety, satire [admittedly, often biting] and storytelling, “Mallard Fillmore” delivers the conservative party line with a blunt instrument.

Which brings me to last Friday’s strip. You may argue that it was an April Fool’s joke, but judging from Tinsley’s 17-year track record, I’d say not. Here's what it said [or view it here]:

Panel 1: "Tiny space cows are colonizing my underpants.
Panel 2: "I, Larry Feldman, am master of all linoleum."
Panel 3: "Head Start works."
Panel 4: "Guess which one liberals don't know is delusional."
I don’t object to Tinsley expressing conservative ideas. I don’t have a problem with satirizing progressives. Our behavior at times has earned the right to be spoofed. What I do take exception to is Mallard’s distortion of facts and the accusation that anyone who believes said facts is “delusional.” When Mallard says that Head Start doesn’t work, he’s parroting [can a duck “parrot?”] a dangerous, war-against-the poor, conservative meme currently circulating in the spending-cut-happy, Republican-dominated US Congress.

Where does he get this idea? In 2010, the US Department of Health and Human Services released the findings of its Head Start Impact Study, a decades-long analysis of the effectiveness of the early-childhood program.  The key finding of the study shows that Head Start works. The study’s authors say:

Providing access to Head Start has a positive impact on children’s preschool experiences. There are statistically significant differences between the Head Start group and the control group on every measure of children’s preschool experiences measured in this study.…The Head Start children outperformed the control group in every domain that the study measured, including positive cognitive, social-emotional, health and parenting impacts. The Head Start children left Head Start more ready for school than their peers in the control group.
However, the study goes on to say that—and here’s the part Tinsley zeroes in on– by the end of first grade, the Head Start children lost many of the advantages they had when they began kindergarten.

“Long-standing opponents of Head Start and other publicly funded early-childhood programs have selectively used these losses to try to discredit such programs” “says the National Head Start Association. “Instead of weakening programs that work, the task now is to figure out how to continue the children’s progress through the early years in formal education.”

Back in 1994, when Tinsley was asked to develop the character that eventually evolved into Mallard Fillmore, he offered three options: a blue hippopotamus, a big nose in tuxedo and cane, and a duck. Tinsley says the hippo went unused for fear of offending overweight people, and the nose was axed because it would “offend people of Jewish and Mediterranean descent, not to mention Arabs and anyone else with a big nose.”

Good decision by the editors to nix the first two, but while the image of Mallard is relatively benign, his views are not.

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.