This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

   The usual thing to mention when it comes to unions is how much better a union job is because of higher pay, real benefits and some security. What we often forget is how unions save lives.


You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

   We take for granted that when we breathe air not filled with asbestos or some other deadly chemicals, that's a union that made sure buildings had safe conditions.

    We don't remember that we eat safer food because of unions--because unions made sure that there were clearer and better conditions in fields that grow our food and plants that process our food.

    And here is a study that just came across my desk this week about miners entitled, "Coal Mine Safety: Do Unions Make a Difference?" by Alison D. Morantz at Stanford Law School. I know this will shock you but the upshot:

...unionization predicts a sizable and robust decline in both traumatic injuries and fatalities, the two safety outcomes that I argue are least prone to reporting bias. I construe these results as evidence for a “real” union safety effect in U.S. underground coal mining. At the same time, I find that unionization predicts higher total and non-traumatic injuries, lending credence to claims that injury reporting practices differ significantly between union and nonunion mines.
   This should not be too surprising. Think of what a union would have meant to the 29 miners who were killed in Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch mine when it exploded in 2010. As the independent inquiry reported:
The story of Upper Big Branch is a cautionary tale of hubris. A company that was a towering presence in the Appalachian coalfields operated its mines in a profoundly reckless manner, and 29 coal miners paid with their lives for the corporate risk-taking.[emphasis added]
  As the president of the Mineworkers, Cecil Roberts, points out:
As Americans - and especially coal miners - learn about the causes of tragedies like that at the Upper Big Branch mine, one of the things that stands out is that Upper Big Branch, like the other mines where disasters have occurred since 2006, was a non-union mine. The simple truth is that union mines are safer mines, and this study proves that.

Miners have long known that there is a union 'safety effect,' as the study calls it. Working in a union-represented mine, with the backing of our Local Union safety committees and our International Union safety experts, makes a huge difference.

  Unions don't allow coal companies--or any other company--to operate in a reckless manner because unions are concerned about lives, not profit.

   Something to remember in an era when the Scott Walkers of the world seek to wipe off the map the only institution that keeps some measure of safety at work.

Extended (Optional)

Originally posted to Tasini on Fri May 27, 2011 at 07:29 AM PDT.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement and In Support of Labor and Unions.

Your Email has been sent.