This is only a Preview!

You must Publish this diary to make this visible to the public,
or click 'Edit Diary' to make further changes first.

Posting a Diary Entry

Daily Kos welcomes blog articles from readers, known as diaries. The Intro section to a diary should be about three paragraphs long, and is required. The body section is optional, as is the poll, which can have 1 to 15 choices. Descriptive tags are also required to help others find your diary by subject; please don't use "cute" tags.

When you're ready, scroll down below the tags and click Save & Preview. You can edit your diary after it's published by clicking Edit Diary. Polls cannot be edited once they are published.

If this is your first time creating a Diary since the Ajax upgrade, before you enter any text below, please press Ctrl-F5 and then hold down the Shift Key and press your browser's Reload button to refresh its cache with the new script files.


  1. One diary daily maximum.
  2. Substantive diaries only. If you don't have at least three solid, original paragraphs, you should probably post a comment in an Open Thread.
  3. No repetitive diaries. Take a moment to ensure your topic hasn't been blogged (you can search for Stories and Diaries that already cover this topic), though fresh original analysis is always welcome.
  4. Use the "Body" textbox if your diary entry is longer than three paragraphs.
  5. Any images in your posts must be hosted by an approved image hosting service (one of: imageshack.us, photobucket.com, flickr.com, smugmug.com, allyoucanupload.com, picturetrail.com, mac.com, webshots.com, editgrid.com).
  6. Copying and pasting entire copyrighted works is prohibited. If you do quote something, keep it brief, always provide a link to the original source, and use the <blockquote> tags to clearly identify the quoted material. Violating this rule is grounds for immediate banning.
  7. Be civil. Do not "call out" other users by name in diary titles. Do not use profanity in diary titles. Don't write diaries whose main purpose is to deliberately inflame.
For the complete list of DailyKos diary guidelines, please click here.

Please begin with an informative title:

Under the law, a "US person" includes corporations charted in the United States, and Rupert Murdoch's empire, aka News Corp, is a US person. Which means News Corp is subject to US law, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

It now seems clear that employees of News Corp bribed British cops to spike their investigation into the News of the World phone hacking scheme. Which is not only a violation of British law, it's also a violation of the FCPA, which makes it illegal for a US person to pay a foreign public official to

induce the foreign official to do or omit to do an act in violation of his or her lawful duty
In this case, foreign police were paid by NOTW (a News Corp subsidiary) to not investigate several thousand crimes that it was committing. That would certainly seem to be a violation of US law.

You must enter an Intro for your Diary Entry between 300 and 1150 characters long (that's approximately 50-175 words without any html or formatting markup).

The Guardian (as usual) is already on this, predicting criminal charges against James Murdoch, Rupert's son and CEO of the NOTW.

The Butler University law professor Mike Koehler, an FCPA expert, said: "I would be very surprised if the US authorities don't become involved in this [NI] conduct."

He said the scandal appeared to qualify as an FCPA case on two counts. First, News Corp is a US-listed company, giving the US authorities jurisdiction to investigate allegations. "Second, perhaps more importantly, the act requires that payments to government officials need to be in the furtherance of 'obtaining or retaining' business. If money is being paid to officials, in this case the police, in order to get information to write sensational stories to sell newspapers, that would qualify," he said.

But it gets even better:
Conduct that violates the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA may also give rise to a private cause of action for treble damages under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), or to actions under other federal or state laws. For example, an action might be brought under RICO by a competitor who alleges that the bribery led to the defendant winning a foreign contract.
In other words, a UK competitor of News Corp (and there are still lots of non-Murdoch papers in Britain, like the Guardian) could sue News Corp in US court for violations of RICO based on News Corp's bribery of public officials. They would have to prove monetary damages (in terms of lost circulation), but having done so they could collect three times the damages in fines.

And and and ...

According to RICO, a whistleblower within the corrupt organization would be entitled to as much as one-third of any damages collected. Which means millions await those now laid-off staffers of NOTW who are willing to squeal on their bosses.

Let the games begin!

Extended (Optional)

Your Email has been sent.