I went to the dictionary and I looked up the word "Anarchy"

1. A state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority.
2. Absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.

Am I missing something here? or is there anything that the republicans are doing that falls outside of the definition of promoting anarchy?

When Grover Norquist said that he wants to "shrink government to a size that it can be drowned in the bathtub", why is this not anarchy?

I don't get it.  We treat the republican mindset as though it is simply a "difference of opinion" from regular political movements, therefore people believe that it is a harmless political stance.

They are all anarchists aren't they?

7:40 AM PT: My point is that Grover Norquist gets a free pass.  He has real policies that are getting enacted all over the place, but we don't get to have a word to describe what it would be like to live in a world of his creation.  His followers all believe that there would be no consequence of having no taxes and no government, and we currently have no word to describe his vision.  "Corporatist", or "Authoritarian" are not part of the agenda that he presents.  There should be a word that accurately describes him as he would wish to be described.

Your Email has been sent.