Yes indeed folks, it's time for another installment in the neverending Orwellian saga staring the energy executives, the Vice President and the energy rape of the United States of America.
But a White House document subsequently obtained by The Washington Post showed that officials from Exxon Mobil, Conoco (before its merger with Phillips), Shell Oil and BP America met in the White House complex with the Cheney aides who were developing a national energy policy, parts of which became law and parts of which are still being debated.
Lying? Energy Executives lying to the American people?!?! Impossible say the Republicans. According to the Republicans, it all depends on what your definition of "particiapte" is.
Last week, the Congressional energy panel asked the executives to clarify their testimony - and remember, this was the testimony that the Repubican leadership would not allow to be given under oath. Yesterday, the committee released the carefully "retooled" responses.
John Hofmeister, president of Shell Oil, said that to his knowledge the company did not meet with the task force. However, he said, Shell representatives "did meet with the administration -- including the Vice President and his staff -- on a broad range of energy policy issues."
James J. Mulva, chairman of ConocoPhillips, said that he answered the question "based upon my knowledge of Phillips' conduct prior to the merger with Conoco and on my knowledge of ConocoPhillips' conduct subsequent to the merger." Officials of Conoco met with task force staff before the merger.
Chevron, whose statement was previously released, said the company provided written recommendations on energy policy to President Bush but did not participate in task force meetings. Exxon Mobil, which also previously made its statement public, said the company did not participate in the task force; but the company said it presented information on global energy supply and demand to an administration official.
Lautenberg has now asked the Justice Dept. to investigate the executive's testimony.
So, when is it that a LIE is a "retool" and not a LIE?