| Should Hillary's most recent disavowals finally put to rest the question of whether or not she might try to be the Democratic nominee for President in 2004? | |
| Yes, she has said "no," and that's that. |
35 votes - 74 %
|
| No, she has said "no," but who can believe her. |
1 vote - 2 %
|
| No, her disavowal, like the Japanese zero pilots, came in stealth in the early hours of December 7 and portends suffering, anguish, and terrible human toll. |
3 votes - 6 %
|
| Maybe. So far she has said "no" every time she's been asked, but what if her answer changes subtly in the next few months? What if, for instance, she begins saying "nope"? |
2 votes - 4 %
|
| No way! Doesn't the fact that she went on like a dozen Sunday news shows to say "no" tell you anything? |
2 votes - 4 %
|
| No, she'll let a fall guy take this nomination. If the election gets close in October, she will endorse Bush. |
3 votes - 6 %
|
| No. When she said "no," she was actually referring to a form of highly stylized Japanese theater, in which dialogue belies actions. |
1 vote - 2 %
|
| No. Russert and Stephanopoulos gave her an out by asking the wrong questions. It's absurd to suggest that the frontrunner would for any reason drop out, leaving an opening for Hillary. Much more likely is that Dean or Clark will be found dead next June |
0 votes - 0 %
|
| 47 Total Votes | |
Back to Indisputable Evidence?!.
