Why do they always seem so much more on the ball? Here's something from the RNC:
Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie will discuss an ad posted on the Moveon.org website comparing President George W. Bush to Adolf Hitler. Tune in Today and catch Chairman Gillespie, on:
4:00 p.m. CNN's Inside Politics
7:00 p.m. MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews
Good for Gillespie. It's all worthless whining, but he's out there getting the GOoPer spin into the broadcast sphere. It's his job.
On the other hand, I've spent the last week showing how the New Republic is owned by Republicans and Bush donors, yet still is referred to as "liberal" and how the AP had two reporters cover the debate, and both did a hatchet job on the event. Yet I don't see Terry McAuliffe or anyone else on the agenda to talk about these outrages.
Why not?
And watch whether anyone, during those segments, brings up this NY Post opinion piece by Ralph Peters which equates Dean to Hitler.
In other words, why Gillespie cries over the MoveOn ads done by amateur filmakers, GOoPer allies are using the exact same rhetoric against one of our candidates.
If any of you watch these shows, please report back. Was the Peters' piece brought up?