Skip to main content

Four years ago, I remember being surprised by how well President Bush performed in the debates.  Last night, I was frankly surprised at how poorly he performed.  

The eye rolling, the long, awkward pauses.  Bush wasn't just defensive, there was a weird air of entitlement; it looked at moments like he was irritated that he had to make his case, as though he expected the public to know it already and was angry at them that there might be any doubt.  As a result, his normally charasmatic style of speaking in short sentences came off as arrogant and insincere.

I think that Bush is remarkably weak here, if the media narrative can be made to focus on this the same way it focused on the serial exaggerator/sigher, etc with Gore, because it speaks directly to the President's character.  Folks around these parts have long seen through the thin veneer of down home folksiness to see the self-centered pr*ck beneath.  I think the public caught their first glimpse of it last night.

Last night was the first broadly public indication of the unaccountable kid, the kid who has always had his messes cleaned up for him, and has never had to take responsibility for anything.

That narrative ties immediately to Bush's unwillingness to even acknowledge the mess in Iraq, and with the history of his business ventures, military service, etc ad naseum.

If I were in the Kerry camp, I would be making every effort to make that the narrative.

I'm curious to hear your thoughts.

Originally posted to tyroneslothrop on Fri Oct 01, 2004 at 11:37 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Osama bin Laden doesn't get to decide... (none)
    I get to decide.

    Very telling.

    Rage, rage, against the lying of the Right.

    by Maryscott OConnor on Fri Oct 01, 2004 at 11:35:31 AM PDT

  •  Presumption of continuance (none)
    IIRC, Mario Cuomo wrote in "Why Lincoln Matters" that the current president is running on the presumption of continuance rather than on a comprehensive vision.

    Last night's debate performance certainly confirmed this for me.  But then I'm ABB anyway.

    Liberal: "I still think it's a respectable word. Its root is "liber," the Latin word for "free," and isn't that what we are all about?"--Mary McGrory

    by mini mum on Fri Oct 01, 2004 at 11:36:51 AM PDT

  •  Bush has been hiding (none)
    By not engaging the public and the press for so long, whatever rudimentary communication skills Bush has had in the past have obviously atrophied. I'm astonished at any positive spin put on this guy's communication skills.

    I wish I could have debated him.

    "Mr. President, if it walks like a duck, if it talks like a duck, if it lies like a duck ..."

  •  Exactly , Bush seemed annoyed... (none)
    that he was even required to run for office again. Rahter than telling us why we should not fire him, he acted entitled to the job.

    My wife, a high-school teacher, called it:

    "Bush reminds me of those Senior-year boys from wealthy families after getting their acceptance letters to private university. They quit doing their homework and act superior. They are horrible."

    •  Josh... (none)
      ...recommends circulating the images, which I think is a good idea, but I think they need to be put in context.

      You said it better than I did, the President appeared annoyed at the public for having to make the case for why he should be reelected.  The fact is, however, that this resentment at being accountable to the public is not an aberration, but rather a dominant character trait.

      notsoforeignpolicy, a new blog dedicated to following Congressional proceedings relating to US foreign

      by tyroneslothrop on Fri Oct 01, 2004 at 12:15:47 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site