Daily Kos

UN: Iraqi Nuclear-Related Materials Have Vanished

Mon Oct 11, 2004 at 03:32:45 PM PDT

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Equipment and materials that could be used to make nuclear weapons are disappearing from Iraq (news - web sites) but neither Baghdad nor Washington appears to have noticed, the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency reported on Monday.

Satellite imagery shows that entire buildings in Iraq have been dismantled. They once housed high-precision equipment that could help a government or terror group make nuclear bombs, the International Atomic Energy Agency said in a report to the U.N. Security Council.

Equipment and materials helpful in making bombs also have been removed from open storage areas in Iraq and disappeared without a trace, according to the satellite pictures, IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei said.

While some military goods that disappeared from Iraq after the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion, including missile engines, later turned up in scrap yards in the Middle East and Europe, none of the equipment or material known to the IAEA as potentially useful in making nuclear bombs has turned up yet, ElBaradei said.

The equipment -- including high-precision milling and turning machines and electron-beam welders -- and materials -- such as high-strength aluminum -- were tagged by the IAEA years ago, as part of the watchdog agency's shutdown of Iraq's nuclear program. U.N. inspectors then monitored the sites until their evacuation from Iraq just before the war.

The United States barred the inspectors' return after the war, preventing the IAEA from keeping tabs on the equipment and materials up to the present day.

Under anti-proliferation agreements, the U.S. occupation authorities who administered Iraq until June, and then the Iraqi interim government that took power at the end of June, would have to inform the IAEA if they moved or exported any of that material or equipment.

But no such reports have been received since the invasion, officials of the watchdog agency said.

The United States also has not publicly commented on earlier U.N. inspectors' reports disclosing the dismantling of a range of key weapons-making sites, raising the question of whether it was unable to monitor the sites.

'WE SIMPLY DON'T KNOW'

In the absence of any U.S. or Iraqi accounting, council diplomats said the satellite images could mean the gear had been moved to new sites inside Iraq or stolen. If stolen, it could end up in the hands of a government or terrorist group seeking nuclear weapons.

"We simply don't know, although we are trying to get the information," said one council diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity.

U.S. officials had no immediate comment on the report.

President Bush (news - web sites), locked in a tough reelection battle with Senator John Kerry (news - web sites) of Massachusetts, justified the war, in part, by saying that then-Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) was on the brink of developing a nuclear bomb that he might use against the United States or give to terrorists.

Both men agreed during a Sept. 30 debate that nuclear proliferation is the most serious threat facing the United States.

A new CIA (news - web sites) report last week by chief U.S. weapons investigator Charles Duelfer made clear, however, that Saddam had all but given up on his nuclear program after the first Gulf War (news - web sites) in 1991.

ElBaradei, whose agency dismantled Iraq's nuclear arms program over a decade ago, drew similar conclusions to the Duelfer report well before the March 2003 invasion.

Tags: (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 11 comments

  •  can you combine this with... (none / 0)

    the worse than sinclair diary? Same story and it deserves attention!

    Sorry I'm new to this so I have no idea if this is possible....

  •  Guarding (none / 0)

    If Bush really believed that this stuff was of any importance, they would, presumably have guarded it. One more sign that they didn't believe their own premises for going to war.

    What's really amazing is that entire buildings vanished, not just the contents. It takes a lot of work to move a building.

  •  'It's hard work!' (none / 1)

    Apparently, a little too hard...
  •  You know, of course... (none / 0)

    which story the SCLM will prioritize over this one:

    Shiite Fighters in Iraq Turning in Weapons

    In other words, it's the "yay!  We're WINNING in Iraq!  It's all gonna be OK!" story, versus the story about what's really happening over there.


    There is only one "bug killer" that will work on "Oil Maggots"-- Hydrogen. -- edscan

    by Plutonium Page on Mon Oct 11, 2004 at 07:42:03 PM PDT

  •  This is unbelievable!! (none / 0)

    Isn't the reason given by Pres. Bush of why we were right to go to war in Iraq is because Saddam had the knowledge & could pass it? Well, things have been passed along alright. This material that should have been secured is now out there somewhere in the hands of who knows what.

    This president is just weak on security.

  •  PLEASE RECOMMEND THIS (none / 0)

    I've never read a more concise reason to vote our current president out of office.  This story needs to get disseminated as far and as wide as possible.

    I've just finished reading Helen Caldicott's "The New Nuclear Danger", and I am SPOOKED.

    She sums it all up by saying

    Globally the annual military expenditure stands at 780 billion [350 billion of it is the USA].  The total amount required to provide global health care, eliminate starvation and malnutrition, provide clean water and shelter for all, remove land mines, eliminate global warming, ozone depletion and acid rain, retire the paralyzing debt of developing nations, prevent soil erosion, produce safe, clean energy, stop overpopulation, and eliminate illiteracy is only one third that amount -- 237.5 billion dollars [per year].
    Source: Gustav Niebuhr, "A Mission to Redirect Mony Used for Defense," The New York Times (October 3, 2000)

    And a quote by Albert Einstein for you all (from Helen Caldicott's book also):

    You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war.  The very prevention of war requires more faith, courage and resolution than are needed to prepare for war.

    I was going to write this diary until I noticed that it was already written.

    Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear. ~William E. Gladstone, 1866

    by intrados on Mon Oct 11, 2004 at 08:52:09 PM PDT

  •  Lying sack of shit (none / 0)

    Here's what George Bush says about nuclear proliferation in the first debate:

    well, first of all, I agree with my opponent that the biggest threat facing this country is weapons of mass destruction in the hands of a terrorist network. And that's why proliferation is one of the centerpieces of a multi-prong strategy to make the country safer.

    Yet he cuts funding to stop nuclear proliferation while simultaneously developing our own new nuclear weapons.  Not to mention wasting who knows how much money deploying a missile defense shield that not only doesn't work, but breaks a half-dozen nuclear proliferation treaties in and of themselves.

    New environmental blogging community at the Earth Community Project.

    by Lipo on Mon Oct 11, 2004 at 09:10:07 PM PDT

Permalink | 11 comments