The MIS Director is currently in hiding. Jeff can reach him.
By internally tampering with Diebold Optical Scanners as well as Diebold Electronic E voting machines, the hacking, ( done from remote locations under the control of Mel Stembler's facilities ( see below ) , votes were altered, switched , deleted or detroyed in numerous Florida, Ohio and New Mexico counties and then switched from John Kerry to George Bush.
They seem to know a lot of the details:
The second part of this scheme seems to be that they also cover their tracks by using the names of Felons and others purged falsely onto the Felon voter roles. This I believe allows them to seem to use legitimate numbers by first inflating the roles and them flipping or using them in some places with out drawing to much attention. This also may be why we saw so many overvotes in places where there weren't enough felon votes. This last sentence is my speculation.
The scheme used computers at their facilities, an MIS director who trained juvenile delinquents under custody as well as others to hack into Diebold systems around the country and place software kernels that would raise votes for one candidate while deleting the others.
This would explain both the erratic polls discrepancies reported in especially swing states but also here in North Carolina.
These software fixes are supposed to leave no audit trail. This also would explain the seemingly random gltiches of people voting Kerry and getting Bush on review or the strrange over vote errors. I believe by the seizing of evidence under your FOIA we will be able with the help of experts to discover the audit trail and other evidence of tampering.
Our specific evidence centers around Bay Point School in So Miami as the epicenter facility.
This will hopefully blow wide open very soon. Please God let this rid us of George Bush and his cronies.
Update [2004-11-15 23:59:45 by mikepridmore]: I received this in an e-mail from someone I trust who referred to the letters as being from Bob Graham. I am looking for alternate confirmation. Update [2004-11-16 1:38:50 by mikepridmore]: A lot of people doubt the authenticity of the data in these letters. If the data is fake we will know soon enough. I have read that Russell Baker had interviewed the witness recently. Maybe there is a story that will come out and maybe there isn't. But while I agree it is healthy to be skeptical, I think we should talk about this reasonably.