Sovereign Immunity

Imagine that Iraq is a patient on an operating table. We're performing surgery to remove a malignant brain tumor, a complex procedure that normally requires a team of 15 surgeons and assistants… but we're trying to do it with six, and none of our would-be doctors have done it before. (In fact, our chief surgeon — after watching his predecessor operate on Kosovo, Haiti and Somalia — declared that our hospital should get out of this branch of medicine.)

The instruments in our operating theater consist entirely of knives. The knives are the world's finest, and are very sharp, but we have a critical shortage of blood plasma, sterile bandages, and other important tools that would help us control the bleeding and stabilize the patient. We do have a supply of these items in reserve, but our chief surgeon decided not to call them up before he began the operation; if he calls for them now it'll make him look bad, and they'll take forever to get here regardless.

We've now removed most of the brain tumor (we think), but the cancer has spilled into the bloodstream and is damaging other vital organs. We're cutting open the patient to attack the cancers where they grow (when your only tool is a scalpel, etc.), but this approach is leaving a lot of ugly scars. Chemocratic elections would be more effective at treating the cancer… but apparently the chief doesn't think the patient is stable enough, and fears that chemo would kill off cells he's trying to preserve.

At least one of our brain surgeons has managed to dirty his hands (and, in spite of this, is still operating), so the patient's natural immune system is starting to react to us. We frisked the patient's pockets while he was unconscious, and in spite of what hospital bureaucrats promised us before we started, Iraq doesn't have enough money to pay for the operation — not that we have any illusions about whether the patient would want to anymore, or about how grateful he'll be if and when he recovers. We also didn't find a gun in his pocket, though that was supposedly one of the reasons he needed treatment right away.

If you disagree with the surgeon about any aspect of this procedure, it must be because you hate our hospital, you hate the surgeon, you're anti-surgery, or you didn't think the patient needed treatment. In any case, your disloyalty is appalling: You should be standing behind our chief surgeon in this time of crisis, and it doesn't make sense to change doctors in mid-procedure.

And, finally, our chief surgeon — who has a pressing engagement — is about to take Iraq off the anesthetic. Even though we're still up to our elbows in the patient, our chief has declared that the surgery will end as scheduled… and, to demonstrate how well we've done, we'll return Iraq to full consciousness. Our sawbones-in-chief expects that the patient will be up and about momentarily; oh yes, he'll be walking around the operating room, thanking his doctors and making a speedy recovery from this successful operation.

Just you wait and see.

(Originally posted at A Yank in Oz.)

•  See what?

  Do you have a suggestion here on where to go with Iraq, or just another doom and gloom prediction? (Which you can always claim was correct, even if it does not pan out).

  by Great Balls of Fire on Sun Jun 27, 2004 at 07:19:50 AM PDT

  •  Re: See what?

    You could, if you wished, find several suggestions in this analogy:  Vote George Bush out of office, fire Rumsfeld immediately, focus on the date we hold free elections rather than a faux "transfer of sovereignty", put more effort into rebuilding the Iraqi army (and I applaud the decision to assign that task to Lt. Gen. Petraeus, who has shown himself to be one of our most capable and effective leaders at peacekeeping), and stop trying to create comforting illusions for short-term political gain.

    We're creating an expectation around the "transfer of sovereignty" that will heighten the pressure for a withdrawal of our troops:  After all, Iraq is back on its feet now, right?  Their new government will have declared martial law -- the political equivalent of going into shock -- but surely now that they're sovereign they should be able to stand on their own and handle their own internal security matters.  The reasons why our boys should still be over there dying are going to get harder to explain.

    by Forbes on Sun Jun 27, 2004 at 03:10:38 PM PDT

    •  I saw a comment

      by an Arab on this so called transfer. In a nut shell apparently such things are big events,in their culture, which they respect (we may not, or have no understanding of). So if the Arab world sees this as a positive event, then I support it.

      Your other comments, just parallel whats happening now, so in effect you have not provided any new ideas, just follow the same course with a different name on front. Great they can learn to hate another American. Just great.

      by Great Balls of Fire on Sun Jun 27, 2004 at 06:56:04 PM PDT