Skip to main content

Among the varied collection of Armstrong Williams' excuses so far today, one struck me.  Earlier on CNN's lame-duck "Crossfire," Novakula offered the claim that Williams is a pundit, and therefore not actually a journalist, and therefore not bound by the standards of journalistic integrity.

Well, I agree that pundits aren't journalists.  Therefore, what citizens like us have to learn from this is something I like to call the "No Pundit Left Behind" strategy.  We should assume that all conservative pundits who spout their opinions on television, radio or the Internet are being paid by the government or some power sympathetic to their claim.

Any liberal on Sean Hannity's show should answer every question by asking him "How much were you paid by the Bush Administration to make that last comment?"  Same with Limbaugh.  O'Reilly.  Savage.  Coulter.  All of them.

This Arnstrong Williams affair is actually a huge opening into the realities of how the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy works.  Scaife and other billionaires pay for huge structures to funnel their ideas into the media.  In some cases, it appears, they actually eliminate the middle man and pay the media.  So we should just assume that they're paying everyone.

Before you think that this tactic is dishonest, read this sentence:

The contract, detailed in documents obtained by USA TODAY through a Freedom of Information Act request, also shows that the Education Department, through the Ketchum public relations firm, arranged with Williams to use contacts with America's Black Forum...

Ketchum is the same company that helped the Department of Health and Human Services put out fake video news releases touting Medicare that looked like the real thing.

This is what the right does.  They pull the wool over the eyes of the public by paying for media coverage, making it look like everyday journalism.  We should make the argument that,  given the evidence, citizens should not trust any conservative opinion on television.  

Based on the preponderance of evidence, we should assume Hannity, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Coulter and everyone else is being bought and paid for.  And that should characterize every interaction with them on TV or radio by every liberal from now until the end of time.

This could lead to open mockery by liberal pundits, saying things like "oh, you must be one of the beneficiaries of the No Pundit Left Behind Act."  Every answer should be "How much did that comment cost the Bush Administration?"  "Do you make more than Armstrong Williams peddling this drivel or less?"

Already you can tell that conservatives know what kind of bad news this is.  Jonah Goldberg even got off his fat ass to denounce Williams and suggest he should return the money to the Department of Education.  He knows that, if spun right, this could mean the end of conservative punditry as we know it.

Republicans never worry about whether or not their charges are baseless.  They just charge.  We could learn from that, and thank Armstrong Williams with the ammo to put all conservative pundits on the defensive.

Originally posted to dday on Fri Jan 07, 2005 at 02:10 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  $1 in the jar (4.00)


    "Killing a man to defend an idea isn't defending an idea. It's killing a man." -Jean-Luc Godard, "Notre Musique"

    by dday on Fri Jan 07, 2005 at 01:58:41 PM PST

    •  It does make you wonder. (none)
      Ten well-placed "mouthpieces" would cost 1.25 million, easily covered by a slush fund or some "anonymous" benefactor. Who knows how many more of these types are getting smaller checks? In some markets, an extra, say $10,000 a year under the table can do a lot of good and insure that these people have a voice even in local media. And free-lance "hit" pieces, they probably pay for too.

      Who knows, there could be a whole army of paid flacks behind the "conservative" phenomenon, lining up to get their pay day. No wonder they aren't all that original! Who needs to be original when you can get paid by saying exactly what you are told to say and when to say it. And do you even care about content with this scheme anyway? It's not if you risk losing anything much.

      Dean: Who knew a Country Doctor could heal a Country? Dean 2008 and beyond!

      by CarolDuhart on Fri Jan 07, 2005 at 10:42:10 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site