Skip to main content

If the Democrats can't make major gains within the next few weeks, they need to seriously review their viability as a political party.  There are at least five major points that should be made on a frequent basis when speaking to the press.  I make simple points on the following after the fold:
  • Bolton Nomination
  • Justice Sunday
  • Republican filibusters and blocking judicial nominees
  • Federal Judiciary is Majority Republican
  • Delay and the Ethics drama

Bolton Nomination

As Senator Chris Dodd has continually pushed the inappropriateness of Mr. Bolton trying to get intelligence analysts fired, the Republicans have countered with various soundbites.  Their party line is that Mr. Bolton is just a tough guy and that is exactly what is needed at the UN.  To emphasize the point they have been evoking the Oil for Food scandal, inferring that a US Ambassador of Mr. Bolton's quality would ensure that UN scandals would go away.  Every time a republican says this there should be a Democrat there to ask, "So, are you saying that John Negroponte did a bad job as UN Ambassador?"  After all, he was there for two and a half years of the scandal.

Justice Sunday

The contention that Democrats are filibustering "People of Faith" should be turned back on the more radical denominations that supported this radical rally.  Every time a Republican says that Dems are against "People of Faith," there should be a Democrat there asking if the Republicans are inferring that the 205 approved judicial nominees are not "People of Faith."  I don't know the names of the 205 approved judges, but I'm willing to bet that they represent a pretty decent cross section of America.  I think the Dems should pick out a few that represent some of the major religious affliations and ask if Dr. Dobson and Senator Frist believe those particular judges are not "People of Faith."  This will show how absurd their argument really is...

Republican Filibusters and Blocking Judicial Nominees

Every time a Republican states that judicial nominees should be given an up or down vote they should be specifically asked if they believe that Sen. Hatch was a poor leader for the Senate Judiciary Committee, since he effectively blocked 60 of President Clinton's judicial nominees.  They should also ask if the Republicans should have filibustered President Johnson's nominee of Abe Fortas for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.  They will either have to parse issues or denounce their own tactics.

Federal Judiciary is Majority Republican

Every time a Republican complains about the judiciary they should be asked why they believe that a majority Republican judiciary does not support the Congressional Republicans' interpretation of the laws.

Delay and the Ethics Drama

Whenever questions about Congressman DeLay ethics are discussed the Democrats should ask why the Republicans think the ethics rules of the House of Representatives needed to be relaxed.  This can also be asked as whether or not the Republican thinks the "House Clean-up" initiated by Newt Gingrich was not needed and the new ethics rules were unnecessary.

I'm certainly no political expert or operative, but I really think the Dems have some big opportunities to make headway in the next few weeks.  I hope they take full advantage of having the Republicans in a vulnerable position.

Originally posted to Peace Monger on Mon Apr 25, 2005 at 08:05 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Problem is timing ... (none)
    While we should be 'pounding', need to keep in mind the timing of everything.  While calling out the hypocrisy, arrogance, damage to the body politic of all of these will score political points, have to remember that Congressional elections are a long way away.  What elements will have legs into those elections?

    Seems to me that out of the five, the only one with the potential for major implications for the 2006 elections would be Tom DeLay.

    Again, the test for the right sign / bumper sticker.  My Monday morning favorite ...

    Vote DeLay to keep Ethics Away ...

    •  Dems Suck at Soundbites (none)
      Your points are well taken.  I agree that most of these items won't have an effect on the 2006 elections.  What concerns me most about the Democratic Party is that they seem to be continually swept away by the Republican message machine.  In general, I'm not a fan of soundbites.  Specifically, I'm not a fan of constantly repeated Republican sound bites that the Dems don't answer back.  A political debate should have two sides.  The Dems fight back in policy rhetoric, but they usually suck at soundbite rhetoric.  Most of America just hears the soundbites.

      "...without a Respectable Navy, Alas America!" - John Paul Jones

      by Peace Monger on Mon Apr 25, 2005 at 08:21:28 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Are Dems doing better? (none)
        While I've tended to agree about the weak-kneed Democratic behavior -- in Congress and elsewhere -- we certainly are seeing signs of a major change in recent months.  Washington Post has a major article,
        Unexpectedly, Capitol Hill Democrats Stand Firm, right up this alley today.

        "Democrats were supposed to enter the 109th Congress meek and cowed, demoralized by November's election losses and ready to cut deals with Republicans who threatened further campaigns against "obstructionists." But House and Senate Democrats have turned that conventional wisdom on its head.

        "They have stymied President Bush's Social Security plan and held fast against judicial nominees they consider unqualified. To protest a GOP rule change, they have kept the House ethics committee from meeting. And they have slowed -- and possibly derailed -- Bush's nomination of John R. Bolton to become ambassador to the United Nations."

        And, so on ....

        Now, is denying Bolton a vote when everything else goes through a tremendous victory?  Are we just grasping at straws?  Not sure ... In any event, an interesting, inside-Washington read from the front page of today's paper.

        19 April 05, Day 1315 ... Osama still "wanted dead or alive"

        by besieged by bush on Mon Apr 25, 2005 at 10:19:07 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site