Skip to main content

Remember this come nomination season, 2008: the key question for you deciding who to vote for in the primaries is not whether or not this or that candidate is "electable."

It is whether or not you agree with what the candidate supports. If you happen to line up best with Al Sharpton, vote for him. If it happens to be Feingold, vote for him. If it happens to be Clinton, vote for her. But, do not hold off voting for somebody with whom you agree simply because you think you have figured out what "electability" means. You don't. The very idea of what constitues electability in this country has been polluted by GOP talking points and the noise machine.  And you can't game the machine--you gotta become the machine.

I found myself saying that Clinton looked like she could win "if you look at the numbers" yesterday and I realized that I was falling into the electability trap again. We have to work extra hard to make sure we don't make that error this time around or we will never have a Democratic Party that speaks with conviction.  And that means continuing to lose elections we should win.

Corked Bats.  A "blog" unworthy of attention.

HEY, Texas Bloggers... Come and Take It!

Originally posted to Garemko on Sun Jun 05, 2005 at 05:09 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I agree (none)
    That's why I won't hesitate to support Kerry -- he's the one I most believe in, never mind the CW that someone who's already run once has no chance (apparently people forgot to tell Nixon that back in the 1960s).
  •  Great Diary (none)
    Remember that "electability" was practically the entire basis of Kerry's primary campaign in 2004.  That isn't a very effective theme once you're in the General Campaign against the other party.  All of the other candidates had themes in their campaigns, with Edwards' two Americas and his economic populism, Dean's anti- war and anti- establishment campaign, Clark's military service.  Electability should not be the main reason to support a candidate.

    "You have the power to take back the Democratic Party."- Gov. Howard Dean- DNC Chair

    by maxgray7 on Sun Jun 05, 2005 at 05:26:10 PM PDT

    •  Kerry's theme (none)
      was competence, experience and responsibility.

      I've been going back over his speeches from that time period -- I haven't found any that mention "electability." Can you cite some sources for your claim that he referred to this?

      •  No (none)
        He wouldn't say that of course, but for his theme to be competence implies that the other Democrats weren't competent, to take on Bush.  Don't you remember the whole thing about Dean being "unelectable" and the "Dated Dean, Married Kerry" movement?

        "You have the power to take back the Democratic Party."- Gov. Howard Dean- DNC Chair

        by maxgray7 on Mon Jun 06, 2005 at 03:16:36 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  KERRY WON`T RUN (none)
    i doubt kerry will run because he will either have to run for president or re-election to the senate.after it`s obvious he can`t get the nomination he`ll stick with the senate.he probably  would have been a pretty good president but he had his shot and blew it.people don`t give a loser a second the way my computer is haunted, as i was typing this it somehow got posted, please excuse half wriiten one!
  •  please excuse (none)
    ok very weird previous half written post disappeared. never mind!!!!!!!!!
  •  Looks good for Kucinich! (none)
    While I doubt it will happen, if everybody who is a DK thought-sympathizer votes the way you suggest--on the issues--then DENNIS IS THE MAN.

    (If he runs again.)

    Nah, will never happen...  :-(

  •  Wait a minute (none)
    Are you claiming that every time a politician presents himself as competent and well-qualified, he's really just saying he's most electable?


  •  No (none)
    Look at the primary season exit polling.  This is coming from Democrats.  The number one issue for Democrats was electability.  Above health care, above Iraq, above terrorism, above retirement security, above choice, etc etc.  That is not the candidates' fault--it is the mentality of the rank and file that wanted so badly to get an "electable" candidate (by cable news standards) that they voted for Kerry.  I am saying we should not care what Republicans think we should do or what they think of us when we pull the lever in the primaries.  It is our party and the only way we will win is if  we reward Democrats who frame from our perspective and stop trying to be political scientists about everything.  We (Democratic voters) need to stand on our values if we seek to demand it from our candidates.  
Click here for the mobile view of the site