Skip to main content

If you want a view of what it was like back in the good old days(hasn't been updated since Sept 03), the following link you should like:

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/theBigLeak.html

Of note is that it mentions Andrea Mitchell as one of the 6 reporters who the WH pitched Plame to.

I'm putting this up here as a central repository of IIPA, espionage act and other legal goodies related to the case for easy reference. Other statutes to follow.

The impotrant stuff is in bold,

More after I finish this bottle of Jack

                 CHAPTER 15--NATIONAL SECURITY

   SUBCHAPTER IV--PROTECTION OF CERTAIN NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION

Sec. 421. Protection of identities of certain United States
         undercover intelligence officers, agents, informants, and sources

(a) Disclosure of information by persons having or having had access to
         classified information that identifies covert agent

    Whoever( the following are the three standards that need to be met)

, having or having had authorized access to classified
information that identifies a covert agent

, intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information,

knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States,

shall be fined not more than $50,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(b) Disclosure of information by persons who learn identity of covert agents as result of having access to classified information

    Whoever, as a result of having authorized access to classified information, learns the identify of a covert agent and intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent's intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

;TITLE 50--WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE

CHAPTER 15--NATIONAL SECURITY

 SUBCHAPTER IV--PROTECTION OF CERTAIN NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION

Sec. 422. Defenses and exceptions

(a) Disclosure by United States of identity of covert agent

    It is a defense to a prosecution under section 421 of this title that before the commission of the offense with which the defendant is charged, the United States had publicly acknowledged or revealed the intelligence relationship to the United States of the individual the disclosure of whose intelligence relationship to the United States is the basis for the prosecution.

(b) Conspiracy, misprision of felony, aiding and abetting, etc.

    (1) Subject to paragraph (2), no person other than a person committing an offense under section 421 of this title shall be subject to prosecution under such section by virtue of section 2 or 4 of title 18 or shall be subject to prosecution for conspiracy to commit an
offense under such section.
    (2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply (A) in the case of a person who
acted in the course of a pattern of activities intended to identify and expose covert agents and with reason to believe that such activities would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United States, or (B) in the case of a person who has authorized access to classified information.

(c) Disclosure to select Congressional committees on intelligence

    It shall not be an offense under section 421 of this title to transmit information described in such section directly to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate or to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(d) Disclosure by agent of own identity

It shall not be an offense under section 421 of this title for an individual to disclose information that solely identifies himself as a covert agent.

[update] The first 4 paragraphs of the NDA any White House senior staff member would've signed
1. Intending to be legally bound, I hereby accept the obligations contained in this Agreement in consideration of my being granted access to classified information. As used in this Agreement, classified information is marked or unmarked classified information, including oral communications, that is classified under the standards of Executive Order 12958, or under any other Executive order or statute that prohibits the unauthorized disclosure of information in the interest of national security; and unclassified information that meets the standards for classification and is in the process of a classification determination as provided in Sections 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4(e) of Executive Order 12958, or under any other Executive order or statute that requires protection for such information in the interest of national security. I understand and accept that by being granted access to classified information, special confidence and trust shall be placed in me by the United States Government.

2. I hereby acknowledge that I have received a security indoctrination concerning the nature and protection of classified information, including the procedures to be followed in ascertaining whether other persons to whom I contemplate disclosing this information have been approved for access to it, and that I understand these procedures.

3. I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of classified information by me could cause damage or irreparable injury to the United States or could be used to advantage by a foreign nation. I hereby agree that I will never divulge classified information to anyone unless: (a) I have officially verified that the recipient has been properly authorized by the United States Government to receive it; or (b) I have been given prior written notice of authorization from the United States Government Department or Agency (hereinafter Department or Agency) responsible for the classification of the information or last granting me a security clearance that such disclosure is permitted. I understand that if I am uncertain about the classification status of information, I am required to confirm from an authorized official that the information is unclassified before I may disclose it, except to a person as provided in (a) or (b), above. I further understand that I am obligated to comply with laws and regulations that prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of classified information.

4. I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in the termination of any security clearances I hold; removal from any position of special confidence and trust requiring such clearances; or the termination of my employment or other relationships with the Departments or Agencies that granted my security clearance or clearances. In addition, I have been advised that any unauthorized disclosure of classified information by me may constitute a violation, or violations, of United States criminal laws, including the provisions of Sections 641, 793, 794, 798, *952 and 1924, Title 18, United States Code, * the provisions of Section 783(b), Title 50, United States Code, and the provisions of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982. I recognize that nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the United States of the right to prosecute me for any statutory violation.

Title 18, pt 1, chpt 37 aka espionage act http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000792----000-.html http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000793----000-.html http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000794----000-.html http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000798----000-.html

Originally posted to BonScott on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 09:14 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I tried to find something like this (none)
    in Kosopedia. It should be there. Maybe you can find a good spot.
  •  Can I suggest (none)
    Changing the diaries nam so that it doesn't feed into the right wingnuts effort of sliming valerie plame and the wilsons?

    Roveg-ate

    Traitor-gate

    Etc.

    Or even any other that you can think of that doesn't make plame seem like the bad one here?

    I know that it is just a word... But it is part of an ongoing "framing" for any debate on this.

    IWT News
    Independent World Television

    by m16eib on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 04:31:57 PM PDT

  •  There has been a lot on this. (none)
    Many people have posted some of these statutes.

    The problem right now is that it is almost imposible to bring charges on these statutes. You seem to have skipped the parts that say the disclosure must be intentional and that the leaker must have knowledge that the operative was covert.

    Don't worry! It seems that there is plenty for Fitg=zgerald to use in other statutes though.

    "It's about the accountability, stupid." Thomas Davis 2005.

    by Tomtech on Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 05:25:48 PM PDT

    •  If you look below the fold (none)
      At section 421 part A or B it spells out the scenarios regarding people's disclosure. I've been one of the people who brings up the statute in order to bring things into the realm of possibility, not wishful thinking.

      Just from the reports made public, Rove has fufilled 2 of the 3 requirements to be found guilty under the IIPA directly(just waiting to hear that someone told him the content of the State Dept. ISN memo), and Rove, along with Libby and Fleischer at a minimum can be indicted and probably convicted under title 50, chapter 15, subchapter IV, sec 422 subsection b paragraph 2 under conspiracy provisions of the IIPA.

      With folks in the White House signing NDAs and learning security requirements, the defense of "I didn't know I shouldn't confirm CIA status" is utter rubbish.

    •  there is proof that it was intentional (none)
      See coopers remarks in the Time article where he say (Paraphrasing):

      "rove told me that the informnation WAS GOING TO BE DECLASSIFIED SOON..." (It ain't near exactly what he said but the quote is there in the Time article).

      AND it demonstrates very clearly that rove knew the information was still classified YET he chose to "say too much" anyways.(and the memo still is classified to this day, as near as I can tell.)

      rove can be nailed under many different crimes, and he should receive the full treatment. I will not be surprised if he does get charged under the Espionage Act, as well as obstructing justice, perjury, and conspiracy. This is obviously not just an accidental outing of an agent. There is too much evidence (from what little we know, and the Judges statements) that points to very serious crimes.

      IWT News
      Independent World Television

      by m16eib on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 11:00:30 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  A little help (none)
    I look in the satutes listed below and none of it makes any sense. Any help would be appreciated.


     Section 422
    (b) Conspiracy, misprision of felony, aiding and abetting, etc.

        (1) Subject to paragraph (2), no person other than a person
    committing an offense under section 421 of this title shall be subject          
    to prosecution under such section by virtue of section 2 or 4 of title          
    18 or shall be subject to prosecution for conspiracy to commit an
    offense under such section.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site