Skip to main content

On Sunday, July 10, 2005, roughly a month before Cindy arrived in Crawford, conservative Eliot Cohen does a re-evaluation of the war on the eve of having his son shipping to Iraq:
WaPo: A Hawk Questions Himself as His Son Goes to War

As I watched President Bush give his speech.. I contemplated [ the war] from a different vantage than my usual professorial perch. Our oldest son now dresses like the impassive soldiers who served as stage props for that event; he too wears.. a Ranger tab. Before long he will fight in the war that I advocated..

.. The scholar in me is not surprised when our leaders blunder [in the war], although the pundit in me is dismayed when they do. What the father in me expects from our leaders is, simply, the truth -- an end to happy talk and denials of error, and a seriousness equal to that of the men and women our country sends into the fight.


Surprisingly there were no tar and feathers, no digging dirt and relentless evaluation of what Cohen has ever said in his life..

MSM Double Standard
Arianna Huffington said it all:
Arianna Huffington: Why Are the Media Having Such a Hard Time Covering Cindy Sheehan?

..it's about time we put an end to the absurd double standard wherein a private citizen, staging a courageous and selfless protest, has every word she's ever uttered dug up and scrutinized more closely than some residual DNA on CSI while public officials making life and death decisions are allowed to say the most ludicrous things without being held accountable.

It's truly amazing: the MSM want to hold Sheehan's feet to the fire on statements she's denied making about Israel while allowing Dick "last throes" Cheney, Condi "mushroom cloud" Rice, George "slam dunk" Tenet, Alberto "quaint" Gonzalez, and George "Mission Accomplished" Bush a free pass.


Cindy, Cohen are just parent that want the truth about the war their son's are fighting
Cohen said essentially the same as Cindy: As a parent he wants the truth or as he said so well an end to happy talk and denials of error, and a seriousness equal to that of the men and women our country sends into the fight.

More Cohen musings about the war

A Hawk Questions Himself as His Son Goes to War: "

Your son is an infantry officer, shipping out soon for Iraq. How do you feel about that?

Pride, of course -- great pride. And fear. And an occasional burning in the gut, a flare of anger at empty pieties and lame excuses, at flip answers and a lack of urgency, at a failure to hold those at the top to the standards of accountability that the military system rightly imposes on subalterns.

It is a flicker of rage that two years into an insurgency, we still expose our troops in Humvees to the blasts of roadside bombs -- knowing that even the armored version of that humble successor to the Jeep is simply not designed for warfare along guerrilla-infested highways, while, at the same time, knowing that plenty of countries manufacture armored cars that are. It is disbelief at a manpower system that, following its prewar routines, ships soldiers off to war for a year or 15 months, giving them two weeks of leave at the end, when our British comrades, more experienced in these matters and wiser in pacing themselves, ship troops out for half that time, and give them an extra month on top of their regular leave after an operational deployment.

It is the sick feeling that churned inside me at least 18 months ago, when a glib and upbeat Pentagon bureaucrat assured me that the opposition in Iraq consisted of '5,000 bitter-enders and criminals,' even after we had killed at least that many. It flames up when hearing about the veteran who in theory has a year between Iraq rotations, but in fact, because he transferred between units after returning from one tour, will go back to Iraq half a year later, and who, because of 'stop-loss orders' involuntarily extending active duty tours, will find himself in combat nine months after his enlistment runs out. And all this because after 9/11, when so many Americans asked for nothing but an opportunity to serve, we did not expand our Army and Marine Corps when we could, even though we knew we would need more troops.

A variety of emotions wash over me as I reflect on our Iraq war: Disbelief at the length of time it took to call an insurgency by its name. Alarm at our continuing failure to promote at wartime speed the colonels and generals who have a talent for fighting it, while also failing to sweep aside those who do not. Incredulity at seeing decorations pinned on the chests and promotions on the shoulders of senior leaders -- both civilians and military -- who had the helm when things went badly wrong. Disdain for the general who thinks Job One is simply whacking the bad guys and who, ever conscious of public relations, cannot admit that American soldiers have tortured prisoners or, in panic, killed innocent civilians. Contempt for the ghoulish glee of some who think they were right in opposing the war, and for the blithe disregard of the bungles by some who think they were right in favoring it. A desire -- barely controlled -- to slap the highly educated fool who, having no soldier friends or family, once explained to me that mistakes happen in all wars, and that the casualties are not really all that high and that I really shouldn't get exercised about them.

There is a lot of talk these days about shaky public support for the war. That is not really the issue. Nor should cheerleading, as opposed to truth-telling, be our leaders' chief concern. If we fail in Iraq -- and I don't think we will -- it won't be because the American people lack heart


Originally posted to lawnorder on Fri Aug 19, 2005 at 10:19 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4.00)
    < clink >

    I hope this helps Cindy. Spread the word if you think it does!

  •  I think we ALL deserve answers. n/t (4.00)

    Those who are willing to sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither. (Paraphrasing B. Franklin)

    by p a roberson on Fri Aug 19, 2005 at 10:28:52 AM PDT

  •  In the end, defeating the neo-cons (none)
    and turning the ship of state will depend on not on motivating the left but swinging teh people in the midde, people like Cohen who once were supporters of Bush but no longer can.  That is where this battle is fought.
  •  Oh Jeez, (4.00)
    Now we're gonna have to add a conservative pundit to the long list of Those Who Hate America? Apparently, this guy didn't get the memo that the reason we're losing this war is because too many people Aren't Clapping Hard Enough.
    </snark>

    Genesis is exactly backwards. Our troubles started from obedience, not disobedience. And humanity is not yet created. - Robert Anton Wilson

    by Pope Nixon on Fri Aug 19, 2005 at 10:43:59 AM PDT

  •  If you want to see what this war is really about. (4.00)
        Check out the website newamericancentury.org
        Bear in mind that the "american values" that this group wants to spread are those of their corporate sponsors not what you were taught in your high school civics class.
    •  Yup, seen that one (none)

      The PNAC website is some crazy-ass shit to read. Downright scary, because you realize that these people actually believe what they're shovelling. For every person in the administration who, like Cheney, is obviously only in it for the money, there are two or three that actually believe that you can impose democracy at gunpoint.

      Crazy thing is, that site has been online since, I believe, 1995 or so (could be wrong with the exact year, but definitely long before the 2000 election.) The views of these people, and what they planned to do if they got power, have been available for the whole world to see for many years. They're not hiding. Why did no one notice this before they slithered into office?

      Genesis is exactly backwards. Our troubles started from obedience, not disobedience. And humanity is not yet created. - Robert Anton Wilson

      by Pope Nixon on Fri Aug 19, 2005 at 10:57:24 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I've heard of it before. (none)
        And maybe even looked it up but I checked again yesterday and it's still available online. I don't know what it is, colossal arrogance or what, but their plan is right there to see. They must think that no one will see it or not understand how this is connected to what is going on. We are paying for this in blood and money.
        WTF
        If I could double recommend this diary I would.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site